daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Improved YOLO algorithm based on multi-scale object detection in haze weather scenarios AITranslate

1.College of Engineering, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321000, China
2.Department of Wuhan Comprehensive Transportation Research Institute, Co., Ltd, Wuhan 430056, China
3.Department of College of Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266110, China
4.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Lombardy 20133, Italy
AITranslate
Publisher: Youke Publish Co., Ltd.
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites Download PDF

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Computer vision-based traffic object detection plays a critical role in road traffic safety. Under hazy weather conditions, images captured by road monitoring systems exhibit three main challenges: significant scale variations, abundant background noise, and diverse perspectives. These factors lead to insufficient detection accuracy and limited real-time performance in object detection algorithms. We propose AMC-YOLO an improved YOLOv11-based traffic detection algorithm to address these challenges. In this work, we replace the C3k block's bottleneck module with our novel attention-gate convolution (AGConv), which improves contextual information capture, enhances feature extraction, and reduces computational redundancy. Additionally, we introduce the multi-dilation sharing convolution (MDSC) module to prevent feature information loss during pooling operations, enhancing the model's sensitivity to multi-scale features. We design a lightweight and efficient cross-channel feature fusion module (CCFM) for the path aggregation neck to adaptively adjust feature weights and optimize the model's overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate that AMC-YOLO achieves a 1.1% improvement in mAP@0.5 and a 2.7% increase in mAP@0.5:0.95 compared to YOLOv11n. On graphics processing unit (GPU) hardware, it achieves real-time performance at 376 (FPS) with only 2.6 million parameters, ensuring high-precision traffic detection while meeting deployment requirements on resource-constrained devices.

KeyWords AITranslate

convolutional network object detection self-attention mechanism YOLO algorithm

[1]X. Zhao, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, X. Han, M. Deveci, and M. Parmar, "A review of convolutional neural networks in computer vision," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 4, p. 99, 2024.

[2]R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation," 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, H, USA, 23–28 June 2014, pp. 580–587.

[3]K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, "Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition," IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1904–1916, 2015.

[4]J. Dai, Y. Li, K. He, and J. Sun, "R-FCN: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks," 30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain, 5–10 December 2016, pp. 379–387.

[5]J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, "You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection," 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016, pp. 779–788.

[6]W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg, "SSD: Single shot multibox detector," Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 11–14 October 2016, Part I 14, Springer, 2016, pp. 21–37.

[7]T.-Y. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Doll´ar, "Focal loss for dense object detection," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 40, pp. 2980–2988, 2018.

[8]A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 6000–6010, 2017.

[9]T. Zhang, L. Li, Y. Zhou, W. Liu, C. Qian, J.-N. Hwang, and X. Ji, "CAS-ViT: Convolutional additive self-attention Vision Transformers for efficient mobile applications," arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03703, 2024.

[10]D. Shi, "Transnext: Robust foveal visual perception for vision transformers," 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA, 17–21 June 2024, pp. 17773–17783.

[11]J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, "Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger," IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21–26 July 2017, pp. 7263–7271.

[12]N. Li, M. Wang, G. Yang, B. Li, B. Yuan, and S. Xu, "DENS-YOLOv6: A small object detection model for garbage detection on water surface," Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, no. 18, pp. 55751–55771, 2024.

[13]J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L. -J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, "ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database," 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, FL, USA, 20–25 June 2009, pp. 248–255.

[14]N. Carion, F. Massa, G. Synnaeve, N. Usunier, A. Kirillov, and S. Zagoruyko, "End-to-end object detection with Transformers," in European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer, 2020, pp. 213–229.

[15]S. Cui and H. Deng, "PMG-DETR: Fast convergence of DETR with position-sensitive multi-scale attention and grouped queries," Pattern Analysis and Applications, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 58, 2024.

[16]Z. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Cao, H. Hu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, "Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows," 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada, 10–17 October 2021, pp. 10 012–10 022.

[17]T.-Y. Lin, P. Doll'ar, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie, "Feature pyramid networks for object detection," 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017, pp. 2117–2125.

[18]J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, "Squeeze-and-excitation networks," 2018 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, pp. 7132–7141.

[19]P. Wang, P. Chen, Y. Yuan, D. Liu, Z. Huang, X. Hou, and G. Cottrell, "Understanding convolution for semantic segmentation," 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, pp. 1451–1460.

[20]S. Liu, L. Qi, H. Qin, J. Shi, and J. Jia, "Path aggregation network for instance segmentation," 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, pp. 8759–8768.

[21]L. Tang, H. Zhang, H. Xu, and J. Ma, "Rethinking the necessity of image fusion in high-level vision tasks: A practical infrared and visible image fusion network based on progressive semantic injection and scene fidelity," Information Fusion, vol. 99, p. 101870, 2023.

[22]N. Yin, L. Shen, M. Wang, L. Lan, Z. Ma, C. Chen, X.-S. Hua, and X. Luo, "COCO: A coupled contrastive framework for unsupervised domain adaptive graph classification," 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, Honolulu Hawaii, USA, 23–29 July 2023, pp. 40 040–40 053.

[23]S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun, "Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1137–1149, 2016.

[24]Z. Cai and N. Vasconcelos, "Cascade r-CNN: High quality object detection and instance segmentation," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1483–1498, 2019.

[25]Y. Zhao, W. Lv, S. Xu, J. Wei, G. Wang, Q. Dang, Y. Liu, and J. Chen, "DETRS beat yolos on real-time object detection," 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA, 17–21 June 2024, pp. 16965–16974.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.23919/CHAIN.2025.000008

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Computer vision-based traffic object detection plays a critical role in road traffic safety. Under hazy weather conditions, images captured by road monitoring systems exhibit three main challenges: significant scale variations, abundant background noise, and diverse perspectives. These factors lead to insufficient detection accuracy and limited real-time performance in object detection algorithms. We propose AMC-YOLO an improved YOLOv11-based traffic detection algorithm to address these challenges. In this work, we replace the C3k block's bottleneck module with our novel attention-gate convolution (AGConv), which improves contextual information capture, enhances feature extraction, and reduces computational redundancy. Additionally, we introduce the multi-dilation sharing convolution (MDSC) module to prevent feature information loss during pooling operations, enhancing the model's sensitivity to multi-scale features. We design a lightweight and efficient cross-channel feature fusion module (CCFM) for the path aggregation neck to adaptively adjust feature weights and optimize the model's overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate that AMC-YOLO achieves a 1.1% improvement in mAP@0.5 and a 2.7% increase in mAP@0.5:0.95 compared to YOLOv11n. On graphics processing unit (GPU) hardware, it achieves real-time performance at 376 (FPS) with only 2.6 million parameters, ensuring high-precision traffic detection while meeting deployment requirements on resource-constrained devices.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Junqing Shi, Sui Ruan, Yanhong Tao, et al. Improved YOLO algorithm based on multi-scale object detection in haze weather scenarios[J]. Chain, 2025, 2(2): 183-197. DOI:10.23919/CHAIN.2025.000008.
MLA [1] Junqing Shi, et al., "Improved YOLO algorithm based on multi-scale object detection in haze weather scenarios." Chain, vol. 2, no. 2, 2025, pp. 183-197, https://doi.org/10.23919/CHAIN.2025.000008.
APA [1] Junqing Shi, Sui Ruan, Yanhong Tao, Yingxu Rui, Jun Deng, Peng Liao, & Peng Mei. (2025). Improved YOLO algorithm based on multi-scale object detection in haze weather scenarios. Chain, 2(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.23919/CHAIN.2025.000008
IEEE [1] Junqing Shi, Sui Ruan, Yanhong Tao, Yingxu Rui, Jun Deng, Peng Liao, and Peng Mei, "Improved YOLO algorithm based on multi-scale object detection in haze weather scenarios," Chain, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 183-197, 2025, doi: 10.23919/CHAIN.2025.000008. keywords: {convolutional network;object detection;self-attention mechanism;YOLO algorithm}