daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Chemical Compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 Ceramics and 316L Stainless Steel AITranslate

1.School of Materials Science and Engineering,Inner Mongolia University of Technology,Hohhot 010051,China
2.Research Institute of Resources and Environmental Technology (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 101407,China
3.National Engineering Research Center for Green Special Metallurgy of High Quality Nonferrous Metals,Beijing 101407,China
4.Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of New Materials and Surface Engineering,Hohhot 010051,China
5.Zhongyuan Critical Metals Laboratory,Zhengzhou 450001,China
AITranslate
Publisher: Youke Publishing Co., Ltd
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites Download PDF

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

With the rapid development of the nuclear industry,the safety of nuclear reactors has become a global concern. During normal operation or accident scenarios,control rods may undergo chemical interactions with their cladding materials upon contact,thereby affecting their service life. As new control rod materials are developed,investigating the chemical compatibility between control rods and their cladding materials is crucial. Eu2O3,with its high thermal neutron absorption cross-section and high melting point,is a suitable neutron-absorbing material for control rods in nuclear reactors,particularly under high-temperature operating conditions. However,Eu2O3 exhibits relatively poor chemical stability in water or humid air. Given its high thermal neutron absorption cross-section and melting point,and the fact that the addition of ZrO2 can enhance its chemical stability,Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics are considered a promising candidate material for new accident-tolerant control rods. Meanwhile,316L stainless steel,known for its excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical properties,is widely used for structural components in nuclear reactors. Therefore,the chemical compatibility of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with 316L stainless steel cladding under accident conditions has attracted significant attention. To study the chemical compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel,this paper investigated the compatibility by forming a diffusion couple through close contact between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel. The study focused on the chemical compatibility under simulated accident temperatures (1000~1200 ℃) after heat treatment for 20~60 h. Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with a molar ratio of Eu2O3∶ZrO2=2∶1 was used in the experiment. The microstructure of the diffusion couple interface was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to reveal the chemical compatibility and interdiffusion behavior between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel cladding under simulated accident conditions. The experimental results showed that the surface of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics changed from brown to yellow. Measurements of the sample dimensions revealed no significant changes before and after the experiment,indicating the preservation of the ceramics' apparent mass and structural integrity. Macroscopic observations of 316L stainless steel revealed the formation of a thin film on its surface. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the film on the surface of 316L stainless steel showed the presence of a small amount of SiO2 phase,with no other phases detected. EDS results indicated that the main components of the film were Eu,O,Cr,and Si,with Eu content ranging from 24.37% to 33.49%,Cr content from 9.15% to 11.57%,O content from 43.24% to 54.70%,and Si content from 0.75% to 7.68%. Interface reactions occurred between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel at the interface,accompanied by mutual diffusion of elements. Fe,Cr,Ni,and Si from 316L stainless steel,as well as Eu and O from the ceramics,diffused toward the interface. Eu and O diffused into the stainless-steel matrix,while Si accumulated in the diffusion zone within 316L stainless steel matrix. For the cross-section of 316L stainless steel,after heat treatment at 1000 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances of the elements were 7.51,10.71,and 15.45 μm,respectively. After heat treatment at 1100 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances were 13.53,18.15,and 22.80 μm,respectively. After heat treatment at 1200 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances were 20.19,32.89,and 36.40 μm,respectively. In the chemical compatibility experiment at 1200 ℃ for 60 h,interface reactions between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramicsand 316L stainless steel occurred,resulting in a decrease in Fe content in stainless steel from an initial 70.52% (non-diffusion zone) to 7.75% (diffusion zone),a decrease in Cr content from 16.73% to 2.58%,a decrease in Ni content from 9.44% to 0.95%,and an increase in Si content from 0.75% to 14.35%. Meanwhile,Eu and O contents in 316L stainless steel increased from the initial 0 to 30.28% and 44.09%,respectively,indicating the diffusion of Eu and O from the ceramics into the stainless steel matrix. The diffusion depth as a function of temperature and time was plotted as Δx² against time t,and linear fitting was performed to obtain the diffusion coefficients of Eu at different temperatures. Under heat treatment conditions of 1000~1200 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion coefficients of Eu in stainless steel were (9.93±1.05)×10-16,(2.38±0.05)×10-15,and (6.49±0.46)×10-15 m2·s-1,respectively. The data indicated that the diffusion coefficient of Eu increased with temperature. Therefore,the reaction rate of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with 316L stainless steel could be predicted within the temperature range of 1000~1200 ℃ using diffusion kinetics. This helpedto estimate its service life and mitigate the impact and damage of accidents. The diffusion reaction kinetics at the interface were further analyzed,and Arrhenius relationship between the diffusion coefficient (k) of Eu in 316L stainless steel and temperature (T) was established as:lnk=–(20.80±1.06)–(1.46±0.12)×105/RT,where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in Kelvin. The diffusion activation energy of Eu was calculated to be (146±12) kJ·mol-1 using Arrhenius equation. Temperature was the primary factor affecting the chemical compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel. Studying their chemical compatibility under accident conditions helped to ensure that no harmful chemical reactions occur between the control rod materials and the reactor structural materials under high-temperature conditions,thereby enhancing the safety and reliability of nuclear reactors.

KeyWords AITranslate

Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics 316L stainless steel diffusion behavior diffusion coefficient

[1]IAEA. Nuclear power reactors in the world [R]. Reference Data Series No. 2,IAEA,2022.

[2]IAEA. Country nuclear power profiles [R]. IAEA-CNPP/2023/CD,Vienna:IAEA,2023.

[3]Decreton A,Benigni P,Rogez J,Mikaelian G,Barrachin M,Lomello-Tafin M,Antion C,Janghorban A,Fischer E. Contribution to the description of the absorber rod behavior in severe accident conditions:an experimental investigation of the Ag-Zr phase diagram [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2015,465:849.

[4](李小波. 压水堆堆芯稳态单通道热工计算 [J]. 近代物理学,2014,4(1):15.)

X B Li. Steady-state single-channel thermal calculation of PWR core [J]. Modern Physics,2014,4(1):15.

[5](吴攀,任彦昊,单建强,黄彦平. 压力管式超临界水堆极限事故下“无堆芯熔化”概念评估 [J]. 核动力工程,2021,42(5):156.)

P Wu,Y H Ren,J Q Shan,Y P Huang. Evaluation of the concept of "coreless meltdown" in pressure-tube supercritical water reactor under extreme accident [J]. Nuclear Power Engineering,2021,42(5):156.

[6](王毅飞,刘春明,王彦峰,耿娟娟. 包壳用锆合金表面Cr涂层的高温耐蚀性能 [J]. 稀有金属,2022,46(8):1013.)

Y F Wang,C M Liu,Y F Wang,J J Geng. High temperature corrosion resistance of Cr coating on zirconium alloy surface for cladding [J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals,2022,46(8):1013.

[7]Bourgoin J,Couvreur F,Gosset D,Gosset D,Defoort F,Monchanin M,Thibault X. The behaviour of control rod absorber under irradiation [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,1999,275(3):296.

[8]Lu J Q,Li J W,Huang J H,Zhang F F,Tang C T,Ran G. Preparation and properties of Tm2TiO5 neutron absorbing materials [J]. Rare metals,2018,42(2):191.

[9](任思琪,陈聪,闫国庆,马朝辉,周义鸿,王力军. Eu含量对Eu2O3-HfO2粉体微观结构影响 [J]. 稀有金属,2025,49(4):509.)

S Q Ren,C Chen,G Q Yan,Z H Ma,Y H Zhou,L J Wang. Microstructure of Eu2O3-HfO2 powders with different Eu contents [J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals,2025,49(4):509.

[10]Zinkle S J,Terrani K A,Gehin J C,Terrani K A,Gehin J C,Ott L J,Snead L L. Accident tolerant fuels for LWRs:a perspective [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2014,448(1):374.

[11]Yadav K K,Pal U,R K. Concept of accident tolerant fuel in nuclear reactors [J]. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings,2023,341:62.

[12]Kim D J,Yang J H,Kim D S,Yoon J H,Lee H S,Lim K Y,Kim J Y. Development status of control rod neutron absorber materials for light water reactors with extended control rod lifetime and enhanced safety [J]. Ceramist,2022,25(4):475.

[13]Kim J H,Lee B O. Formation of intermetallic compound at interface between rare earth elements and ferritic-martensitic steel by fuel cladding chemical interaction [J]. Journal of Rare Earths,2012,30(6):599.

[14](刘俊凯,张新虎,恽迪. 事故容错燃料包壳候选材料的研究现状及展望 [J]. 材料导报,2018,32(11):1757.)

J K Liu,X H Zhang,D Yun. Research status and prospect of candidate materials for accident-tolerant fuel cladding [J]. Material Introduction,2018,32(11):1757.

[15](王敏涓,杨光,戚继球,孟庆坤,孙光耀,黄浩. SiCf/TC17复合材料残余应力及界面力学性能研究 [J]. 稀有金属,2024,48(6):822.)

M J Wang,G Yang,J Q Qi,Q K Meng,G Y Sun,H Huang. Residual stresses and interfacial properties of SiCf/TC17 composite [J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals,2024,48(6):822.

[16]Ohta H,Nakamura K,Ogata T,Nagase F. Ohta H,Kinya N,Ogata T. Development of accident tolerant control rod for light water reactors [A]. LWR Fuel with Enhanced Safety and Performance Meeting [C]. Paris:OECD Publishing,2016. 159.

[17]Lori B. Enhanced accident tolerant LWR fuels national metrics workshop report [R]. INL/EXT-12-27497,Germantown,Maryland:Idaho National Laboratory,2013.

[18]Nuclear Energy Agency. Energy Agency. State-of-the-Art Report on Light Water Reactor Accident-Tolerant Fuels [R]. NEA No. 7371,Paris:OECD/NEA,2018.

[19]Ainscough J B,Moore D A,Osborn S C. Europia ceramics for use as fast reactor neutron absorbers [J]. Ceramurgia International,1977,3(1):18.

[20]Xiao Y,Zhu S,Duan J,Wang H M,Wang Z Y,Meng Q B,Liu Y Z,Pan Y L,Wang X,Qi J Q,Lu T C. Preparation and properties of Gd2O3-Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics as promising control rod material [J]. Ceramics International,2023,49(23):39458.

[21]Gilchrist K E,Brown R G,Preston S D. Physical properties of europium sesquioxide [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,1977,68(1):39.

[22]Ohta H,Sawabe T,Ogata T. Accident-tolerant control rod [A]. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Proceedings of Increased Accident Tolerance of Fuels for Light Water Reactors [C]. Paris:OECD Publishing,2013. 1.

[23]Ohno A,Maruyama T,Iseki T,Hiroshige S. Compatibility of Eu2O3 and (Eu,Gd)2O3 with type 316 stainless steel [J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,1981,18(8):608.

[24]Kawamura H,Uchida M,Shestakov V. Compatibility between Be12Ti and SS316LN [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2002,307:638.

[25]Keisuke M,Fernando S,Regina K. Chemical compatibility study between ceramic breeder and EUROFER97 steel for HCPB-DEMO blanket [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials,2017,488:196.

[26]Maeda K. Ceramic fuel-cladding interaction [J]. Comprehensive Nuclear Materials,2012,3:443.

[27]Kim J,Baek J,Lee B,Lee C B,Yoon Y S. Interaction behavior between lanthanide element and ferritic-martensitic steel [J]. Journal of the Korean Institute of Metals and Materials,2010,48:691.

[28]Shin Y C,Leem S J,Kim C M,Kim S J,Sung Y M,Hahn C K,Baek J H,Kim T G. Deposition of europium oxide on Si and its optical properties depending on thermal annealing conditions [J]. J Electroceram,2009,23(2-4):326.

[29](史伟宁,杨树峰. 不锈钢中诱发局部腐蚀的贫Cr区研究进展 [J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2019,39(4):281.)

W N Shi,S F Yang. Research progress of Cr-depleted zone induced local corrosion in stainless steel [J]. Chinese Journal of Corrosion and Protection,2019,39(4):281.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY25010018

Chinese Library Classification Number:TG142

Citation Information:

With the rapid development of the nuclear industry,the safety of nuclear reactors has become a global concern. During normal operation or accident scenarios,control rods may undergo chemical interactions with their cladding materials upon contact,thereby affecting their service life. As new control rod materials are developed,investigating the chemical compatibility between control rods and their cladding materials is crucial. Eu2O3,with its high thermal neutron absorption cross-section and high melting point,is a suitable neutron-absorbing material for control rods in nuclear reactors,particularly under high-temperature operating conditions. However,Eu2O3 exhibits relatively poor chemical stability in water or humid air. Given its high thermal neutron absorption cross-section and melting point,and the fact that the addition of ZrO2 can enhance its chemical stability,Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics are considered a promising candidate material for new accident-tolerant control rods. Meanwhile,316L stainless steel,known for its excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical properties,is widely used for structural components in nuclear reactors. Therefore,the chemical compatibility of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with 316L stainless steel cladding under accident conditions has attracted significant attention. To study the chemical compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel,this paper investigated the compatibility by forming a diffusion couple through close contact between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel. The study focused on the chemical compatibility under simulated accident temperatures (1000~1200 ℃) after heat treatment for 20~60 h. Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with a molar ratio of Eu2O3∶ZrO2=2∶1 was used in the experiment. The microstructure of the diffusion couple interface was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to reveal the chemical compatibility and interdiffusion behavior between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel cladding under simulated accident conditions. The experimental results showed that the surface of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics changed from brown to yellow. Measurements of the sample dimensions revealed no significant changes before and after the experiment,indicating the preservation of the ceramics' apparent mass and structural integrity. Macroscopic observations of 316L stainless steel revealed the formation of a thin film on its surface. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the film on the surface of 316L stainless steel showed the presence of a small amount of SiO2 phase,with no other phases detected. EDS results indicated that the main components of the film were Eu,O,Cr,and Si,with Eu content ranging from 24.37% to 33.49%,Cr content from 9.15% to 11.57%,O content from 43.24% to 54.70%,and Si content from 0.75% to 7.68%. Interface reactions occurred between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel at the interface,accompanied by mutual diffusion of elements. Fe,Cr,Ni,and Si from 316L stainless steel,as well as Eu and O from the ceramics,diffused toward the interface. Eu and O diffused into the stainless-steel matrix,while Si accumulated in the diffusion zone within 316L stainless steel matrix. For the cross-section of 316L stainless steel,after heat treatment at 1000 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances of the elements were 7.51,10.71,and 15.45 μm,respectively. After heat treatment at 1100 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances were 13.53,18.15,and 22.80 μm,respectively. After heat treatment at 1200 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion distances were 20.19,32.89,and 36.40 μm,respectively. In the chemical compatibility experiment at 1200 ℃ for 60 h,interface reactions between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramicsand 316L stainless steel occurred,resulting in a decrease in Fe content in stainless steel from an initial 70.52% (non-diffusion zone) to 7.75% (diffusion zone),a decrease in Cr content from 16.73% to 2.58%,a decrease in Ni content from 9.44% to 0.95%,and an increase in Si content from 0.75% to 14.35%. Meanwhile,Eu and O contents in 316L stainless steel increased from the initial 0 to 30.28% and 44.09%,respectively,indicating the diffusion of Eu and O from the ceramics into the stainless steel matrix. The diffusion depth as a function of temperature and time was plotted as Δx² against time t,and linear fitting was performed to obtain the diffusion coefficients of Eu at different temperatures. Under heat treatment conditions of 1000~1200 ℃ for 20~60 h,the diffusion coefficients of Eu in stainless steel were (9.93±1.05)×10-16,(2.38±0.05)×10-15,and (6.49±0.46)×10-15 m2·s-1,respectively. The data indicated that the diffusion coefficient of Eu increased with temperature. Therefore,the reaction rate of Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics with 316L stainless steel could be predicted within the temperature range of 1000~1200 ℃ using diffusion kinetics. This helpedto estimate its service life and mitigate the impact and damage of accidents. The diffusion reaction kinetics at the interface were further analyzed,and Arrhenius relationship between the diffusion coefficient (k) of Eu in 316L stainless steel and temperature (T) was established as:lnk=–(20.80±1.06)–(1.46±0.12)×105/RT,where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in Kelvin. The diffusion activation energy of Eu was calculated to be (146±12) kJ·mol-1 using Arrhenius equation. Temperature was the primary factor affecting the chemical compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 ceramics and 316L stainless steel. Studying their chemical compatibility under accident conditions helped to ensure that no harmful chemical reactions occur between the control rod materials and the reactor structural materials under high-temperature conditions,thereby enhancing the safety and reliability of nuclear reactors.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Jian Chen, Shufang Yan, Guoqing Yan, et al. Chemical Compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 Ceramics and 316L Stainless Steel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2026, 50(7): 1137-1146. DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY25010018.
MLA [1] Jian Chen, et al., "Chemical Compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 Ceramics and 316L Stainless Steel." Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 50, no. 7, 2026, pp. 1137-1146, https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY25010018.
APA [1] Jian Chen, Shufang Yan, Guoqing Yan, Zhaohui Ma, Xiao Yan, Jiandong Zhang, & Weidong Chen. (2026). Chemical Compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 Ceramics and 316L Stainless Steel. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 50(7), 1137-1146. https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY25010018
IEEE [1] Jian Chen, Shufang Yan, Guoqing Yan, Zhaohui Ma, Xiao Yan, Jiandong Zhang, and Weidong Chen, "Chemical Compatibility between Eu2O3-ZrO2 Ceramics and 316L Stainless Steel," Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1137-1146, 2026, doi: 10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY25010018. keywords: {EuO-ZrO ceramics;316L stainless steel;diffusion behavior;diffusion coefficient}