daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

The fit of planning methods for the part manufacturing industry, a case study AITranslate

Norwegian University of Science and Technology;Department of Industrial Management, SINTEF Technology and Society; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Norwegian University of Science and Technology
AITranslate
Publisher: Springer Nature
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

This paper investigates the specific planning environment of an automotive part manufacturer and characterizes this environment based on variables regarding the product, its demand and the manufacturing process. The fit of different planning methods, namely material requirements planning, reorder point, cyclic planning, kanban, and heijunka to this specific planning environment is analyzed and evaluated by exploratory research. The results show that different product characteristics make it hard to apply a single planning method. None of the investigated methods show the ability to cover the complex requirements of a combined planning environment of two partly divergent product types with a deep value chain.

KeyWords AITranslate

Production planning environment Production planning methods Automotive part manufacturing
No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0075-0

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

This paper investigates the specific planning environment of an automotive part manufacturer and characterizes this environment based on variables regarding the product, its demand and the manufacturing process. The fit of different planning methods, namely material requirements planning, reorder point, cyclic planning, kanban, and heijunka to this specific planning environment is analyzed and evaluated by exploratory research. The results show that different product characteristics make it hard to apply a single planning method. None of the investigated methods show the ability to cover the complex requirements of a combined planning environment of two partly divergent product types with a deep value chain.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Philipp Spenhoff, Marco Semini, Erlend Alfnes, et al. Advances in Manufacturing, 2014(2). DOI:10.1007/s40436-014-0075-0.
MLA [1] Philipp Spenhoff, et al., Advances in Manufacturing, no. 2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0075-0.
APA [1] Philipp Spenhoff, Marco Semini, Erlend Alfnes, & Jan Ola Strandhagen. (2014). Advances in Manufacturing(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0075-0
IEEE [1] Philipp Spenhoff, Marco Semini, Erlend Alfnes, and Jan Ola Strandhagen, Advances in Manufacturing, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0075-0. keywords: {Production planning environment;Production planning methods;Automotive part manufacturing}