Machine learning and density functional theory for catalyst and process design in hydrogen production AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Hydrogen plays a vital role in achieving NetZero emissions as a carbon-free energy carrier. However, its production, especially green hydrogen generated from renewable sources, is hindered by low efficiency and limited yield, primarily due to the performance of the catalysts used. Developing efficient catalysts typically involves extensive experimental work and trial-and-error processes. For instance, screening for effective catalysts still heavily relies on human-lab-work, a process that is time-consuming. Facing this critical challenge, machine learning (ML) emerges as a promising solution. ML, a core component of data mining and analysis that uses statistical algorithms without explicit instructions, can rationalize the design of catalysts through the use of big data, including DFT results. This approach makes a significant shift from traditional trial-and-error approaches to more computationally driven strategies, offering a more effective path to uncovering vital methodologies for catalyst development. This review aims to capture and evaluate the impact of ML algorithms that have driven progress in catalyst research over the past three years. It presents an overview of the existing ML algorithms, exploring their specific functionalities, benefits, and limitations. Besides, this review also considers prospective solutions and future directions for applying ML to enhance the efficiency of green hydrogen production, particularly through electrochemical and biological processes.
KeyWords AITranslate
[1]J. O. Abe, A. Popoola, E. Ajenifuja, and O. M. Popoola, "Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 29, pp. 15072–15086, 2019.
[2]M. Yue, H. Lambert, E. Pahon, R. Roche, S. Jemei, and D. Hissel, "Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 146, p. 111180, 2021.
[3]J. Lai, R. Tan, H. Jiang, X. Huang, Z. Tian, B. Hong, M. Wang, J. Li, "Development of an in situ polymerized artificial layer for dendrite‐free and stable lithium metal batteries," Battery Energy, vol. 3, p.20230070, 2024.
[4]Z. Feng, I. Eiubovi, Y. Shao, Z. Fan, R. Tan, "Review of digital twin technology applications in hydrogen energy," Chain, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54-74, 2024.
[5]A. Kovač, M. Paranos, and D. Marciuš, "Hydrogen in energy transition: A review," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 10016–10035, 2021.
[6]H. Aditiya and M. Aziz, "Prospect of hydrogen energy in Asia-Pacific: A perspective review on techno-socio-economy nexus," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 71, pp. 35027–35056, 2021.
[7]H. X. Li, D. J. Edwards, M. R. Hosseini, and G. P. Costin, "A review on renewable energy transition in Australia: An updated depiction," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 242, p. 118475, 2020.
[8]D. J. Davidson, "Exnovating for a renewable energy transition," Nature Energy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 254–256, 2019.
[9]M. M. V. Cantarero, "Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries," Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 70, p. 101716, 2020.
[10]S. Mallapaty, "How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century," Nature, vol. 586, no. 7830, pp. 482–483, 2020.
[11]Z. Feng, G. Gupta, and M. Mamlouk, "Robust poly (p‐phenylene oxide) anion exchange membranes reinforced with pore‐filling technique for water electrolysis," Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 141, no. 19, p. e55340, 2024.
[12]Z. Feng, G. Gupta, and M. Mamlouk, "A review of anion exchange membranes prepared via Friedel-Crafts reaction for fuel cell and water electrolysis," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023.
[13]Y. Sun, J.-P. Zhang, G. Yang, and Z.-H. Li, "Analysis of trace elements in corncob by microwave Digestion-ICP-AES," GUGNGPUXUE YU GUANGPU FENXI, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1424–1427, 2007.
[14]O. Al-Juboori, F. Sher, U. Khalid, M. B. K. Niazi, and G. Z. Chen, "Electrochemical production of sustainable hydrocarbon fuels from CO2 co-electrolysis in eutectic molten melts," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 8, no. 34, pp. 12877–12890, 2020.
[15]O. Al-Juboori, F. Sher, A. Hazafa, M. K. Khan, and G. Z. Chen, "The effect of variable operating parameters for hydrocarbon fuel formation from CO2 by molten salts electrolysis," Journal of CO2 Utilization, vol. 40, p. 101193, 2020.
[16]Y. Liu, J. Min, X. Feng, Y. He, J. Liu, Y. Wang, J. He, H. Do, V. Sage, G. Yang, and Y. Sun, "A review of biohydrogen productions from lignocellulosic precursor via dark fermentation: Perspective on hydrolysate composition and electron-equivalent balance," Energies, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 2451, 2020.
[17]Y. Sun, Y. Wang, G. Yang, and Z. Sun, "Optimization of biohydrogen production using acid pretreated corn stover hydrolysate followed by nickel nanoparticle addition," International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1843–1857, 2020.
[18]Y. Sun, J. Zhang, G. Yang, and Z. Li, "Analysis of trace elements in corn by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry," Food Sci, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 236–237, 2007.
[19]N. K. Al-Shara, F. Sher, A. Yaqoob, and G. Z. Chen, "Electrochemical investigation of novel reference electrode Ni/Ni (OH)₂ in comparison with silver and platinum inert quasi-reference electrodes for electrolysis in eutectic molten hydroxide," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 50, pp. 27224–27236, 2019.
[20]M. Wang, X. Tan, J. Motuzas, J. Li, and S. Liu, "Hydrogen production by methane steam reforming using metallic nickel hollow fiber membranes," Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 620, p. 118909, 2021.
[21]E. Meloni, M. Martino, A. Ricca, and V. Palma, "Ultracompact methane steam reforming reactor based on microwaves susceptible structured catalysts for distributed hydrogen production," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 26, pp. 13729–13747, 2021.
[22]X. Zhu, X. Liu, H. -Y. Lian, J. -L. Liu, and X. -S. Li, "Plasma catalytic steam methane reforming for distributed hydrogen production," Catalysis Today, vol. 337, pp. 69–75, 2019.
[23]H. -C. Wu, Z. Rui, and J. Y. Lin, "Hydrogen production with carbon dioxide capture by dual-phase ceramic-carbonate membrane reactor via steam reforming of methane," Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 598, p. 117780, 2020.
[24]T. Nguyen, Z. Abdin, T. Holm, and W. Mérida, "Grid-connected hydrogen production via large-scale water electrolysis," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 200, p. 112108, 2019.
[25]C. Zhang, J. Greenblatt, M. Wei, J. Eichman, S. Saxena, M. Muratori, and O. J. Guerra, "Flexible grid-based electrolysis hydrogen production for fuel cell vehicles reduces costs and greenhouse gas emissions," Applied Energy, vol. 278, p. 115651, 2020.
[26]H. Ju, S. Giddey, and S. P. Badwal, "Role of iron species as mediator in a PEM based carbon-water co-electrolysis for cost-effective hydrogen production," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 19, pp. 9144–9152, 2018.
[27]E. S. Aydin, O. Yucel, and H. Sadikoglu, "Experimental study on hydrogen-rich syngas production via gasification of pine cone particles and wood pellets in a fixed bed downdraft gasifier," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 32, pp. 17389–17396, 2019.
[28]S. Fail, M. Binder, R. Rauch, H. Hofbauer, A. Molino, A. Blasiand, and D. Musmarra, "Experimental investigations of hydrogen production from CO catalytic conversion of tar rich syngas by biomass gasification," Catalysis Today, vol. 277, pp. 182–191, 2016.
[29]R. Jahromi, M. Rezaei, S. H. Samadi, and H. Jahromi, "Biomass gasification in a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier: Optimization of operating conditions," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 231, p. 116249, 2021.
[30]W. -X. Peng, S. -B. Ge, A. G. Ebadi, H. Hisoriev, and M. J. Esfahani, "Syngas production by catalytic co-gasification of coal-biomass blends in a circulating fluidized bed gasifier," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 168, pp. 1513–1517, 2017.
[31]K. Kaur and C. V. Singh, "Amorphous TiO2 as a photocatalyst for hydrogen production: A DFT study of structural and electronic properties," Energy Procedia, vol. 29, pp. 291–299, 2012.
[32]J. W. Goodell, S. Kumar, W. M. Lim, and D. Pattnaik, "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations, themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, vol. 32, p. 100577, 2021.
[33]A. A. Khan, A. A. Laghari, and S. A. Awan, "Machine learning in computer vision: A review," EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. e4–e4, 2021.
[34]P. Geerlings and F. De Proft, "Conceptual DFT: the chemical relevance of higher response functions," Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 10, no. 21, pp. 3028–3042, 2008.
[35]M. I. Jordan and T. M. Mitchell, "Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects," Science, vol. 349, no. 6245, pp. 255–260, 2015.
[36]J. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Han, W. Li, J. Cheng, Z. Gan, and J. Gu, "The effect of supercritical water on coal pyrolysis and hydrogen production: A combined ReaxFF and DFT study," Fuel, vol. 108, pp. 682–690, 2013.
[37]X. Wan, Z. Zhang, W. Yu, and Y. Guo, "A density-functional-theory-based and machine-learning-accelerated hybrid method for intricate system catalysis," Materials Reports: Energy, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 100046, 2021.
[38]R. Schlögl, "Heterogeneous catalysis," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3465–3520, 2015.
[39]L. I. Ugwu, Y. Morgan, and H. Ibrahim, "Application of density functional theory and machine learning in heterogenous-based catalytic reactions for hydrogen production," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 2245–2267, 2022.
[40]J. K. Nørskov, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, and T. Bligaard, "Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 937–943, 2011.
[41]H. Zhuang, A. J. Tkalych, and E. A. Carter, "Surface energy as a descriptor of catalytic activity," The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 120, no. 41, pp. 23698–23706, 2016.
[42]H. Tao, S. Liu, J.-L. Luo, P. Choi, Q. Liu, and Z. Xu, "Descriptor of catalytic activity of metal sulfides for oxygen reduction reaction: A potential indicator for mineral flotation," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 6, no. 20, pp. 9650–9656, 2018.
[43]C. F. Dickens, J. H. Montoya, A. R. Kulkarni, M. Bajdich, and J. K. Nørskov, "An electronic structure descriptor for oxygen reactivity at metal and metal-oxide surfaces," Surface Science, vol. 681, pp. 122–129, 2019.
[44]A. B. Getsoian, Z. Zhai, and A. T. Bell, "Band-gap energy as a descriptor of catalytic activity for propene oxidation over mixed metal oxide catalysts," Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 39, pp. 13684–13697, 2014.
[45]G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. Vogt-Maranto, and L. Zdeborová, "Machine learning and the physical sciences," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 91, no. 4, p. 045002, 2019.
[46]Z. -H. Zhou, "A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning," National science review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–53, 2018.
[47]H. B. Barlow, "Unsupervised learning," Neural computation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 295–311, 1989.
[48]A. Glielmo, B. E. Husic, A. Rodriguez, C. Clementi, F. Noé, and A. Laio, "Unsupervised learning methods for molecular simulation data," Chemical Reviews, vol. 121, no. 16, pp. 9722–9758, 2021.
[49]J. A. Hueffel, T. Sperger, I. Funes-Ardoiz, J. S. Ward, K. Rissanen, and F. Schoenebeck, "Accelerated dinuclear palladium catalyst identification through unsupervised machine learning," Science, vol. 374, no. 6571, pp. 1134–1140, 2021.
[50]T. T. Nguyen, N. D. Nguyen, and S. Nahavandi, "Deep reinforcement learning for multiagent systems: A review of challenges, solutions, and applications," IEEE transactions on cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 3826–3839, 2020.
[51]D. C. Montgomery, E. A. Peck, and G. G. Vining, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2021.
[52]M. P. LaValley, "Logistic regression," Circulation, vol. 117, no. 18, pp. 2395–2399, 2008.
[53]B. Charbuty and A. Abdulazeez, "Classification based on decision tree algorithm for machine learning," Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2021.
[54]L. Breiman, "Random forests," Machine Learning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001.
[55]S. Suthaharan and S. Suthaharan, "Support vector machine," Machine Learning Models and Algorithms for Big Data ClasSification: Thinking with Examples for Effective Learning, New York; Springer, 2016, pp. 207–235.
[56]G. I. Webb, E. Keogh, and R. Miikkulainen, "Naïve Bayes," Encyclopedia of machine learning, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 713–714, 2010.
[57]T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system,"in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.
[58]M. L. Zhang and Z. H. Zhou, "ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning," Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2038–2048, 2007.
[59]K. P. Sinaga and M. S. Yang, "Unsupervised K-means clustering algorithm," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 80716–80727, 2020.
[60]Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, "Deep learning," Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
[61]T. Yu, C. Wang, H. Yang, and F. Li, "Machine learning in metal-ion battery research: Advancing material prediction, characterization, and status evaluation," Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 90, pp. 191–204, 2024.
[62]M. Kayfeci, A. Keçebaş, and M. Bayat, "Hydrogen production,"in Solar Hydrogen Production, Elsevier, 2019, pp. 45–83, 2019.
[63]F. Dawood, M. Anda, and G. Shafiullah, "Hydrogen production for energy: An overview," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 3847–3869, 2020.
[64]S. Wang, A. Lu, and C.-J. Zhong, "Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Role of catalysts," Nano Convergence, vol. 8, pp. 1–23, 2021.
[65]A. E. Galetti, M. F. Gomez, L. A. Arrúa, and M. C. Abello, "Hydrogen production by ethanol reforming over NiZnAl catalysts: Influence of Ce addition on carbon deposition," Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 348, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2008.
[66]N. Artrith, Z. Lin, and J. G. Chen, "Predicting the activity and selectivity of bimetallic metal catalysts for ethanol reforming using machine learning," ACS Catalysis, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 9438–9444, 2020.
[67]Z. Liu, W. Tian, Z. Cui, and B. Liu, "A universal microkinetic-machine learning bimetallic catalyst screening method for steam methane reforming," Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 311, p. 123270, 2023.
[68]Y. Yu, J. Yang, K. Zhu, Z. Sui, D. Chen, Y. Zhu, and X. Zhou, "High-throughput screening of alloy catalysts for dry methane reforming," ACS Catalysis, vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 8881–8894, 2021.
[69]Z. Feng, P. O. Esteban, G. Gupta, D. A. Fulton, and M. Mamlouk, "Highly conductive partially cross-linked poly (2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide) as anion exchange membrane and ionomer for water electrolysis," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 75, pp. 37137–37151, 2021.
[70]D. Strmcnik, P. P. Lopes, B. Genorio, V. R. Stamenkovic, and N. M. Markovic, "Design principles for hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst materials," Nano Energy, vol. 29, pp. 29–36, 2016.
[71]Z. Pu, I. S. Amiinu, R. Cheng, P. Wang, C. Zhang, S. Mu, W. Zhao, F. Su, G. Zhang, S. Liao, and S. Sun, "Single-atom catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction: Recent advances and future perspectives," Nano-Micro Letters, vol. 12, pp. 1–29, 2020.
[72]M. Umer, S. Umer, M. Zafari, M. Ha, R. Anand, A. Hajibabaei, A. Abbas, G. Lee, and K. S. Kim, "Machine learning assisted high-throughput screening of transition metal single atom based superb hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts," Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 6679–6689, 2022.
[73]Q. Yang, Y. Y. Cai, Z. Y. Zhu, L. X. Sun, Y. S. L. Choo, Q. G. Zhang, A. M. Zhu, and Q. L. Liu, "Multiple enhancement effects of crown ether in tröger's base polymers on the performance of anion exchange membranes," ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 24806–24816, 2020.
[74]X. Sun, J. Zheng, Y. Gao, C. Qiu, Y. Yan, Z. Yao, S. Deng, and J. Wang, "Machine-learning-accelerated screening of hydrogen evolution catalysts in MBenes materials," Applied Surface Science, vol. 526, p. 146522, 2020.
[75]Q. Tao, T. Lu, Y. Sheng, L. Li, W. Lu, and M. Li, "Machine learning aided design of perovskite oxide materials for photocatalytic water splitting," Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 60, pp. 351–359, 2021.
[76]C. Kim and J. Kim, "Machine learning‐based high‐throughput screening, strategical design and knowledge extraction of Pt/CexZr1− xO2 catalysts for water gas shift reaction," International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 46, no. 15, pp. 21293–21308, 2022.
[77]J. Li, L. Pan, M. Suvarna, and X. Wang, "Machine learning aided supercritical water gasification for H2-rich syngas production with process optimization and catalyst screening," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 426, p. 131285, 2021.
[78]C. Kim, W. Won, and J. Kim, "Early-stage evaluation of catalyst using machine learning based modeling and simulation of catalytic systems: Hydrogen production via water–gas shift over Pt catalysts," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 10, no. 44, pp. 14417–14432, 2022.
[79]L. Yan, S. Zhong, T. Igou, H. Gao, J. Li, and Y. Chen, "Development of machine learning models to enhance element-doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst for hydrogen production through splitting water," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 80, pp. 34075–34089, 2022.
[80]F. Pan, C. -C. Wu, Y. -L. Chen, P. -Y. Kung, and Y. -H. Su, "Machine learning ensures rapid and precise selection of gold sea-urchin-like nanoparticles for desired light-to-plasmon resonance," Nanoscale, vol. 14, no. 37, pp. 13532–13541, 2022.
[81]Ö. Ç. Mutlu and T. Zeng, "Challenges and opportunities of modeling biomass gasification in Aspen Plus: A review," Chemical Engineering & Technology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1674–1689, 2020.
[82]F. Boshagh, K. Rostami, and E. W. van Niel, "Application of kinetic models in dark fermentative hydrogen production–A critical review," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 47, no. 52, pp. 21952–21968, 2022.
[83]L. Mingyi, Y. Bo, X. Jingming, and C. Jing, "Thermodynamic analysis of the efficiency of high-temperature steam electrolysis system for hydrogen production," Journal of Power Sources, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 493–499, 2008.
[84]A. Hosseinzadeh, J. L. Zhou, A. Altaee, and D. Li, "Machine learning modeling and analysis of biohydrogen production from wastewater by dark fermentation process," Bioresource Technology, vol. 343, p. 126111, 2022.
[85]S. Hong, J. Lee, H. Cho, M. Kim, I. Moon, and J. Kim, "Multi-objective optimization of CO2 emission and thermal efficiency for on-site steam methane reforming hydrogen production process using machine learning," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 359, p. 132133, 2022.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.23919/CHAIN.2024.100004
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
Hydrogen plays a vital role in achieving NetZero emissions as a carbon-free energy carrier. However, its production, especially green hydrogen generated from renewable sources, is hindered by low efficiency and limited yield, primarily due to the performance of the catalysts used. Developing efficient catalysts typically involves extensive experimental work and trial-and-error processes. For instance, screening for effective catalysts still heavily relies on human-lab-work, a process that is time-consuming. Facing this critical challenge, machine learning (ML) emerges as a promising solution. ML, a core component of data mining and analysis that uses statistical algorithms without explicit instructions, can rationalize the design of catalysts through the use of big data, including DFT results. This approach makes a significant shift from traditional trial-and-error approaches to more computationally driven strategies, offering a more effective path to uncovering vital methodologies for catalyst development. This review aims to capture and evaluate the impact of ML algorithms that have driven progress in catalyst research over the past three years. It presents an overview of the existing ML algorithms, exploring their specific functionalities, benefits, and limitations. Besides, this review also considers prospective solutions and future directions for applying ML to enhance the efficiency of green hydrogen production, particularly through electrochemical and biological processes.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Xingpeng Tian, Sizhe Zhou, Hongqing Hao, et al. Machine learning and density functional theory for catalyst and process design in hydrogen production[J]. Chain, 2024, 1(2): 150-166. DOI:10.23919/CHAIN.2024.100004. |
| MLA | [1] Xingpeng Tian, et al., "Machine learning and density functional theory for catalyst and process design in hydrogen production." Chain, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024, pp. 150-166, https://doi.org/10.23919/CHAIN.2024.100004. |
| APA | [1] Xingpeng Tian, Sizhe Zhou, Hongqing Hao, Haijun Ruan, Rohit R. Gaddam, Ravi C. Dutta, Tao Zhu, Huizhi Wang, Billy Wu, Nigel P. Brandon, & Rui Tan. (2024). Machine learning and density functional theory for catalyst and process design in hydrogen production. Chain, 1(2), 150-166. https://doi.org/10.23919/CHAIN.2024.100004 |
| IEEE | [1] Xingpeng Tian, Sizhe Zhou, Hongqing Hao, Haijun Ruan, Rohit R. Gaddam, Ravi C. Dutta, Tao Zhu, Huizhi Wang, Billy Wu, Nigel P. Brandon, and Rui Tan, "Machine learning and density functional theory for catalyst and process design in hydrogen production," Chain, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 150-166, 2024, doi: 10.23919/CHAIN.2024.100004. keywords: {sustainable energy;hydrogen production;catalyst;machine learning;material prediction} |
