daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Fast prediction of thermal distortion in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Part 1, a thermal circuit network model AITranslate

University of Notre Dame; University of Pittsburgh; University of Pittsburgh;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;ITAMCO, United States; University of Pittsburgh; University of Notre Dame; University of Notre Dame; The Ohio State University
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

The additive manufacturing (AM) process metal powder bed fusion (PBF) can quickly produce complex parts with mechanical properties comparable to wrought materials. However, thermal stress accumulated during PBF induces part distortion, potentially yielding parts out of specification and frequently process failure. This manuscript is the first of two companion manuscripts that introduce a computationally efficient distortion and stress prediction algorithm that is designed to drastically reduce compute time when integrated in to a process design optimization routine. In this first manuscript, we introduce a thermal circuit network (TCN) model to estimate the part temperature history during PBF, a major computational bottleneck in PBF simulation. In the TCN model, we are modeling conductive heat transfer through both the part and support structure by dividing the part into thermal circuit elements (TCEs), which consists of thermal nodes represented by thermal capacitances that are connected by resistors, and then building the TCN in a layer-by-layer manner to replicate the PBF process. In comparison to conventional finite element method (FEM) thermal modeling, the TCN model predicts the temperature history of metal PBF AM parts with more than two orders of magnitude faster computational speed, while sacrificing less than 15% accuracy. The companion manuscript illustrates how the temperature history is integrated into a thermomechanical model to predict thermal stress and distortion.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.023

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

The additive manufacturing (AM) process metal powder bed fusion (PBF) can quickly produce complex parts with mechanical properties comparable to wrought materials. However, thermal stress accumulated during PBF induces part distortion, potentially yielding parts out of specification and frequently process failure. This manuscript is the first of two companion manuscripts that introduce a computationally efficient distortion and stress prediction algorithm that is designed to drastically reduce compute time when integrated in to a process design optimization routine. In this first manuscript, we introduce a thermal circuit network (TCN) model to estimate the part temperature history during PBF, a major computational bottleneck in PBF simulation. In the TCN model, we are modeling conductive heat transfer through both the part and support structure by dividing the part into thermal circuit elements (TCEs), which consists of thermal nodes represented by thermal capacitances that are connected by resistors, and then building the TCN in a layer-by-layer manner to replicate the PBF process. In comparison to conventional finite element method (FEM) thermal modeling, the TCN model predicts the temperature history of metal PBF AM parts with more than two orders of magnitude faster computational speed, while sacrificing less than 15% accuracy. The companion manuscript illustrates how the temperature history is integrated into a thermomechanical model to predict thermal stress and distortion.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018(22). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.023.
MLA [1] Hao Peng, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.023.
APA [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, Ross Attardo, Pierre Ostiguy, Bernice Aboud Gatrell, Joseph Budzinski, Charles Tomonto, Joel Neidig, M. Ravi Shankar, Richard Billo, David B. Go, & David Hoelzle. (2018). Additive Manufacturing(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.023
IEEE [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, Ross Attardo, Pierre Ostiguy, Bernice Aboud Gatrell, Joseph Budzinski, Charles Tomonto, Joel Neidig, M. Ravi Shankar, Richard Billo, David B. Go, and David Hoelzle, Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.023.