daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Fast prediction of thermal distortion in metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing: Part 2, a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model AITranslate

University of Notre Dame; University of Pittsburgh; University of Pittsburgh;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Canadian Neutron Beam Centre, Chalk River Laboratories;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;Johnson & Johnson Co., United States;ITAMCO, United States; University of Pittsburgh; University of Notre Dame; University of Notre Dame; The Ohio State University
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

The additive manufacturing (AM) process metal powder bed fusion (PBF) can quickly produce complex parts with mechanical properties comparable to that of wrought materials. However, thermal stress accumulated during Metal PBF may induce part distortion and even cause failure of the entire process. This manuscript is the second part of two companion manuscripts that collectively present a part-scale simulation method for fast prediction of thermal distortion in Metal PBF. The first part provides a fast prediction of the temperature history in the part via a thermal circuit network (TCN) model. This second part uses the temperature history from the TCN to inform a model of thermal distortion using a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model (QTM). The QTM model distinguished two periods of Metal PBF, the thermal loading period and the stress relaxation period. In the thermal loading period, the layer-by-layer build cycles of Metal PBF are simulated, and the thermal stress accumulated in the build process is predicted. In the stress relaxation period, the removal of parts from the substrate is simulated, and the off-substrate part distortion and residual stress are predicted. Validation of part distortion predicted by the QTM model against both experiment and data in literature showed a relative error less than 20%. This QTM, together with the TCN, offers a framework for rapid, part-scale simulations of Metal PBF that can be used to optimize the build process and parameters.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

The additive manufacturing (AM) process metal powder bed fusion (PBF) can quickly produce complex parts with mechanical properties comparable to that of wrought materials. However, thermal stress accumulated during Metal PBF may induce part distortion and even cause failure of the entire process. This manuscript is the second part of two companion manuscripts that collectively present a part-scale simulation method for fast prediction of thermal distortion in Metal PBF. The first part provides a fast prediction of the temperature history in the part via a thermal circuit network (TCN) model. This second part uses the temperature history from the TCN to inform a model of thermal distortion using a quasi-static thermo-mechanical model (QTM). The QTM model distinguished two periods of Metal PBF, the thermal loading period and the stress relaxation period. In the thermal loading period, the layer-by-layer build cycles of Metal PBF are simulated, and the thermal stress accumulated in the build process is predicted. In the stress relaxation period, the removal of parts from the substrate is simulated, and the off-substrate part distortion and residual stress are predicted. Validation of part distortion predicted by the QTM model against both experiment and data in literature showed a relative error less than 20%. This QTM, together with the TCN, offers a framework for rapid, part-scale simulations of Metal PBF that can be used to optimize the build process and parameters.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018(22). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001.
MLA [1] Hao Peng, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001.
APA [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, Ross Attardo, Pierre Ostiguy, Ronald B. Rogge, Bernice Aboud Gatrell, Joseph Budzinski, Charles Tomonto, Joel Neidig, M. Ravi Shankar, Richard Billo, David B. Go, & David Hoelzle. (2018). Additive Manufacturing(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001
IEEE [1] Hao Peng, Morteza GhasriKhouzani, Shan Gong, Ross Attardo, Pierre Ostiguy, Ronald B. Rogge, Bernice Aboud Gatrell, Joseph Budzinski, Charles Tomonto, Joel Neidig, M. Ravi Shankar, Richard Billo, David B. Go, and David Hoelzle, Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001.