Determination of accurate theoretical values for thermodynamic properties in bulk metallic glasses AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Deviation values of specific heat difference $$ Updelta C_{ m p},$$ the Gibbs free energy difference $$ Updelta G , $$ enthalpy difference $$ Updelta H , $$ and entropy difference $$ Updelta S $$ between the supercooled liquid and corresponding crystalline phase produced by the linear, hyperbolic, and Dubey’s expressions of $$ Updelta C_{ m p}$$ and the corresponding experimental values are determined for sixteen bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) from the glass transition temperature $$ T_{ ext{g}} $$ to the melting temperature $$ T_{ ext{m}}. $$ The calculated values produced by the hyperbolic expression for $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ most closely approximate experimental values, indicating that the hyperbolic $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ expression can be considered universally applicable, compared to linear and Dubey’s expressions for $$ Updelta C_{ m p},$$ which are accurate only within a limited range of conditions. For instance, Dubey’s $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ expression provides a good approximation of actual experimental values within certain conditions (i.e., $$ xi = Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m g}/Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m m}< 2 , $$ where $$Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m g}$$ and $$Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m m}$$ represent the specific heat difference at temperatures $$ T_{ ext{g}} $$ and $$ T_{ ext{m}} , $$ respectively).
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-013-0040-3
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
Deviation values of specific heat difference $$ Updelta C_{ m p},$$ the Gibbs free energy difference $$ Updelta G , $$ enthalpy difference $$ Updelta H , $$ and entropy difference $$ Updelta S $$ between the supercooled liquid and corresponding crystalline phase produced by the linear, hyperbolic, and Dubey’s expressions of $$ Updelta C_{ m p}$$ and the corresponding experimental values are determined for sixteen bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) from the glass transition temperature $$ T_{ ext{g}} $$ to the melting temperature $$ T_{ ext{m}}. $$ The calculated values produced by the hyperbolic expression for $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ most closely approximate experimental values, indicating that the hyperbolic $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ expression can be considered universally applicable, compared to linear and Dubey’s expressions for $$ Updelta C_{ m p},$$ which are accurate only within a limited range of conditions. For instance, Dubey’s $$Updelta C_{ m p}$$ expression provides a good approximation of actual experimental values within certain conditions (i.e., $$ xi = Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m g}/Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m m}< 2 , $$ where $$Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m g}$$ and $$Updelta C_{ m p}^{ m m}$$ represent the specific heat difference at temperatures $$ T_{ ext{g}} $$ and $$ T_{ ext{m}} , $$ respectively).
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] PeiYou Li, Gang Wang, Ding Ding, et al. Advances in Manufacturing, 2013(1). DOI:10.1007/s40436-013-0040-3. |
| MLA | [1] PeiYou Li, et al., Advances in Manufacturing, no. 1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-013-0040-3. |
| APA | [1] PeiYou Li, Gang Wang, Ding Ding, & Jun Shen. (2013). Advances in Manufacturing(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-013-0040-3 |
| IEEE | [1] PeiYou Li, Gang Wang, Ding Ding, and Jun Shen, Advances in Manufacturing, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40436-013-0040-3. keywords: {Bulk metallic glass (BMG);Specific heat;Linear expression;Hyperbolic expression} |
