daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

A robust FRF damage indicator combined with optimization techniques for damage assessment in complex truss structures AITranslate

Ho Chi Minh City Open University; Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou; Ho Chi Minh City Open University; Ghent University; Yonsei University; Van Lang University
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Highlights • An improved Frequency Response Function (FRF) damage indicator. • A new objective function to solve damage quantification problem. • Damage detection in complex planar truss and space truss dome structures. • Application of several optimization algorithms, i.e. GTO, DOA, AVOA, and GBO. Vibration-based damage detection tools are frequently employed because of their advantages over other non-destructive techniques. This paper presents an improved Frequency Response Function (FRF) indicator for damage identification in complex structures. To verify the effectiveness of the improved damage indicator, different structures are used, namely a 20-Bar Planar Truss (2D), a 28-Bar Space Truss (3D), a 72-Bar Space Truss, and a 600-bar Space Truss. The numerical models of all these structures are built in MATLAB using Finite Element Method (FEM). The improved indicator detects and localises single and multiple damages in the first stage. Next, after eliminating the healthy elements, it is used in a new objective function to solve the damage quantification problem using recent optimization techniques, including Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO), Dingo Optimization Algorithm (DOA), African Vulture Optimization algorithm (AVOA), and Gradient-Based Optimizer (GBO). The results demonstrate that all optimization techniques can accurately predict the exact level of damage. However, GTO is the most efficient in terms of convergence. To study the effectiveness of this indicator in case of noisy data, different levels of noise are considered in the damage assessment exercises.

KeyWords AITranslate

Damage detection Frequency response function GBO DOA Inverse problem 2D and 3D complex truss structures Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer African Vulture Optimization algorithm
No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01197

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Highlights • An improved Frequency Response Function (FRF) damage indicator. • A new objective function to solve damage quantification problem. • Damage detection in complex planar truss and space truss dome structures. • Application of several optimization algorithms, i.e. GTO, DOA, AVOA, and GBO. Vibration-based damage detection tools are frequently employed because of their advantages over other non-destructive techniques. This paper presents an improved Frequency Response Function (FRF) indicator for damage identification in complex structures. To verify the effectiveness of the improved damage indicator, different structures are used, namely a 20-Bar Planar Truss (2D), a 28-Bar Space Truss (3D), a 72-Bar Space Truss, and a 600-bar Space Truss. The numerical models of all these structures are built in MATLAB using Finite Element Method (FEM). The improved indicator detects and localises single and multiple damages in the first stage. Next, after eliminating the healthy elements, it is used in a new objective function to solve the damage quantification problem using recent optimization techniques, including Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer (GTO), Dingo Optimization Algorithm (DOA), African Vulture Optimization algorithm (AVOA), and Gradient-Based Optimizer (GBO). The results demonstrate that all optimization techniques can accurately predict the exact level of damage. However, GTO is the most efficient in terms of convergence. To study the effectiveness of this indicator in case of noisy data, different levels of noise are considered in the damage assessment exercises.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Samir Khatir, Samir Tiachacht, CuongLe Thanh, et al. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022(17). DOI:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01197.
MLA [1] Samir Khatir, et al., Case Studies in Construction Materials, no. 17, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01197.
APA [1] Samir Khatir, Samir Tiachacht, CuongLe Thanh, Hoa TranNgoc, Seyedali Mirjalili, & Magd Abdel Wahab. (2022). Case Studies in Construction Materials(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01197
IEEE [1] Samir Khatir, Samir Tiachacht, CuongLe Thanh, Hoa TranNgoc, Seyedali Mirjalili, and Magd Abdel Wahab, Case Studies in Construction Materials, no. 17, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01197. keywords: {Damage detection;Frequency response function;GBO;DOA;Inverse problem;2D and 3D complex truss structures;Artificial Gorilla Troops Optimizer;African Vulture Optimization algorithm}