Electromagnetic interference shielding of 3D-printed graphene–polyamide-6 composites with 3D-printed morphology AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Graphene–polyamide-6 composite (GC) filament was 3D-printed via melt extrusion (ME). The influence of specimen thickness and internal geometric designs on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) and dielectric properties in the X-band frequency range (8.2–12.4 GHz) was investigated. Increasing specimen thickness from 1 to 5 mm did not improve EMI SE due to impedance matching and the associated reductions in electromagnetic (EM) wave reflection. It was demonstrated that the introduction of suitable internal geometric assemblies avoided impedance matching and significantly improved EMI SE. A material model for simulating EM response of 3D-printed GC was developed and experimentally verified. It was found that different internal geometric designs each displayed unique EM responses. However, geometrical inaccuracies in printed specimens resulted in differences between experimental EM response and that predicted by simulations. These inaccuracies stem from the small size of the features relative to the printer resolution and the ME printing methodology. Therefore, the limitations of a printer when replicating complex geometries must be considered to effectively apply internal geometric designs for enhancing EMI SE of 3D-printed components.
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102020
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
Graphene–polyamide-6 composite (GC) filament was 3D-printed via melt extrusion (ME). The influence of specimen thickness and internal geometric designs on electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) and dielectric properties in the X-band frequency range (8.2–12.4 GHz) was investigated. Increasing specimen thickness from 1 to 5 mm did not improve EMI SE due to impedance matching and the associated reductions in electromagnetic (EM) wave reflection. It was demonstrated that the introduction of suitable internal geometric assemblies avoided impedance matching and significantly improved EMI SE. A material model for simulating EM response of 3D-printed GC was developed and experimentally verified. It was found that different internal geometric designs each displayed unique EM responses. However, geometrical inaccuracies in printed specimens resulted in differences between experimental EM response and that predicted by simulations. These inaccuracies stem from the small size of the features relative to the printer resolution and the ME printing methodology. Therefore, the limitations of a printer when replicating complex geometries must be considered to effectively apply internal geometric designs for enhancing EMI SE of 3D-printed components.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Kok Peng Marcian Lee, Thomas Baum, Robert Shanks, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2021(43). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102020. |
| MLA | [1] Kok Peng Marcian Lee, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 43, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102020. |
| APA | [1] Kok Peng Marcian Lee, Thomas Baum, Robert Shanks, & Fugen Daver. (2021). Additive Manufacturing(43). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.102020 |
| IEEE | [1] Kok Peng Marcian Lee, Thomas Baum, Robert Shanks, and Fugen Daver, Additive Manufacturing, no. 43, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102020. |
