daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

The influence of laser parameters, scanning strategies and material on the fatigue strength of a stochastic porous structure AITranslate

Imperial College London;Betatype Ltd, Unit 4 Bow Enterprise Park;Renishaw PLC, New Mills; Imperial College London; Imperial College London
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Additive manufactured (AM) porous materials behave quantitatively and qualitatively differently in fatigue than bulk materials, and the relationships normally used for the fatigue design of continuous bulk materials are not applicable to AM porous materials particularly for low stiffness applications. This study investigated how the manufacturing methods and the material used during powder bed fusion affects the compressive strength and high cycle fatigue strength of a stochastic porous material for a given stiffness. Specimens were manufactured using varying laser parameters, 3 scan strategies (Contour, Points, Pulsing) and 4 materials. The materials investigated were two titanium alloys: commercially pure grade 2 (CP-Ti) and Ti6Al4V ELI, commercially pure tantalum (Ta) and a titanium-tantalum alloy (Ti-30Ta). The trends observed during fatigue testing for monolithic metals and statically for solid and porous AM materials were not always indicative of the high cycle fatigue behaviour of porous AM materials. Unlike their solid counterparts, porous tantalum and the titanium-tantalum alloy had the greatest fatigue strength for a given stiffness, 8% greater than CP-Ti and 19% greater than Ti6Al4V ELI. Optimisation of the laser parameters and scan strategies was found to also increase the fatigue strength for a given stiffness of porous AM materials by 7–8%.

KeyWords AITranslate

Porous material Fatigue Titanium Tantalum Scan strategy Laser parameter
No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.024

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Additive manufactured (AM) porous materials behave quantitatively and qualitatively differently in fatigue than bulk materials, and the relationships normally used for the fatigue design of continuous bulk materials are not applicable to AM porous materials particularly for low stiffness applications. This study investigated how the manufacturing methods and the material used during powder bed fusion affects the compressive strength and high cycle fatigue strength of a stochastic porous material for a given stiffness. Specimens were manufactured using varying laser parameters, 3 scan strategies (Contour, Points, Pulsing) and 4 materials. The materials investigated were two titanium alloys: commercially pure grade 2 (CP-Ti) and Ti6Al4V ELI, commercially pure tantalum (Ta) and a titanium-tantalum alloy (Ti-30Ta). The trends observed during fatigue testing for monolithic metals and statically for solid and porous AM materials were not always indicative of the high cycle fatigue behaviour of porous AM materials. Unlike their solid counterparts, porous tantalum and the titanium-tantalum alloy had the greatest fatigue strength for a given stiffness, 8% greater than CP-Ti and 19% greater than Ti6Al4V ELI. Optimisation of the laser parameters and scan strategies was found to also increase the fatigue strength for a given stiffness of porous AM materials by 7–8%.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Shaaz Ghouse, Sarat Babu, Kenneth Nai, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018(22). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.024.
MLA [1] Shaaz Ghouse, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.024.
APA [1] Shaaz Ghouse, Sarat Babu, Kenneth Nai, Paul A. Hooper, & Jonathan R.T. Jeffers. (2018). Additive Manufacturing(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.024
IEEE [1] Shaaz Ghouse, Sarat Babu, Kenneth Nai, Paul A. Hooper, and Jonathan R.T. Jeffers, Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.024. keywords: {Porous material;Fatigue;Titanium;Tantalum;Scan strategy;Laser parameter}