daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Mesostructure and porosity effects on the thermal conductivity of additively manufactured interpenetrating phase composites AITranslate

Rice University; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; University of Tennessee-Knoxville; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Rice University
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

We have investigated the relationship between structure and thermal conductivity in additively manufactured interpenetrating A356/316L composites. We used X-ray microcomputed tomography to characterize the pore structure in as-fabricated composites, finding microporosity in both constituents as well as a 50 μm thick layer of interfacial porosity separating the constituents. We measured the thermal conductivity of a 43 vol% 316L composite to be 53 Wm−1K−1, which is significantly less than that predicted by a simple rule-of-mixtures approximation, presumably because of the residual porosity. Motivated by these experimental results we used periodic homogenization theory to determine the combined effects of porosity and unit cell structure on the effective thermal conductivity. This analysis showed that in fully dense composites, the topology of the constituents has a weak effect on the thermal conductivity, whereas in composites with interfacial porosity, the size and structure of the unit cell strongly influence the thermal conductivity. We also found that an approximation formula of the strong contrast expansion method gives excellent estimates of the effective thermal conductivity of these composites, providing a powerful tool for designing functionally graded composites and for identifying mesostructures with optimal thermal conductivity values.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.018

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

We have investigated the relationship between structure and thermal conductivity in additively manufactured interpenetrating A356/316L composites. We used X-ray microcomputed tomography to characterize the pore structure in as-fabricated composites, finding microporosity in both constituents as well as a 50 μm thick layer of interfacial porosity separating the constituents. We measured the thermal conductivity of a 43 vol% 316L composite to be 53 Wm−1K−1, which is significantly less than that predicted by a simple rule-of-mixtures approximation, presumably because of the residual porosity. Motivated by these experimental results we used periodic homogenization theory to determine the combined effects of porosity and unit cell structure on the effective thermal conductivity. This analysis showed that in fully dense composites, the topology of the constituents has a weak effect on the thermal conductivity, whereas in composites with interfacial porosity, the size and structure of the unit cell strongly influence the thermal conductivity. We also found that an approximation formula of the strong contrast expansion method gives excellent estimates of the effective thermal conductivity of these composites, providing a powerful tool for designing functionally graded composites and for identifying mesostructures with optimal thermal conductivity values.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Abdel R. Moustafa, Ralph B. Dinwiddie, Alexander E. Pawlowski, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018(22). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.018.
MLA [1] Abdel R. Moustafa, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.018.
APA [1] Abdel R. Moustafa, Ralph B. Dinwiddie, Alexander E. Pawlowski, Derek A. Splitter, Amit Shyam, & Zachary C. Cordero. (2018). Additive Manufacturing(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.018
IEEE [1] Abdel R. Moustafa, Ralph B. Dinwiddie, Alexander E. Pawlowski, Derek A. Splitter, Amit Shyam, and Zachary C. Cordero, Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.018.