Superprotonic Conductivity in Metal–Organic Frameworks by Charged-Layer-Mediated Proton Conduction AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Through a stepwise functionalization strategy, LiCl@UiO-66-F2(SO3H)2 manifests a superprotonic conductivity of 2.86 S cm–1 (at 90% RH and 90 °C), a record breaker so far. Supported by joint experimental–theoretical studies, the ultrahigh conductivity originates from conduction by protons rather than ions and is rationalized to result from the enhanced acidity of −SO3H by introduction of electronegative −F followed by the formation of double charged layers composed of Li+ and −SO3– layers after encapsulation of LiCl. Importantly, the effect of charged layers has been verified, and charged-layer-mediated proton conduction is unprecedentedly proposed to fill in the missing pieces in existing proton conduction mechanisms, giving insight into the rational design of superprotonic conducting framework materials potentially applied as proton exchange membranes in fuel cells.
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00780
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
Through a stepwise functionalization strategy, LiCl@UiO-66-F2(SO3H)2 manifests a superprotonic conductivity of 2.86 S cm–1 (at 90% RH and 90 °C), a record breaker so far. Supported by joint experimental–theoretical studies, the ultrahigh conductivity originates from conduction by protons rather than ions and is rationalized to result from the enhanced acidity of −SO3H by introduction of electronegative −F followed by the formation of double charged layers composed of Li+ and −SO3– layers after encapsulation of LiCl. Importantly, the effect of charged layers has been verified, and charged-layer-mediated proton conduction is unprecedentedly proposed to fill in the missing pieces in existing proton conduction mechanisms, giving insight into the rational design of superprotonic conducting framework materials potentially applied as proton exchange membranes in fuel cells.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] SaiLi Zheng, CanMin Wu, LaiHon Chung, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2023(8). DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00780. |
| MLA | [1] SaiLi Zheng, et al., ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00780. |
| APA | [1] SaiLi Zheng, CanMin Wu, LaiHon Chung, HuaQun Zhou, Jieying Hu, Zhiqing Liu, Ying Wu, Lin Yu, & Jun He. (2023). ACS Energy Letters(8). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00780 |
| IEEE | [1] SaiLi Zheng, CanMin Wu, LaiHon Chung, HuaQun Zhou, Jieying Hu, Zhiqing Liu, Ying Wu, Lin Yu, and Jun He, ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00780. |
