Reviving Inactive Lithium and Stabilizing Lithium Deposition for Improving the Performance of Anode-Free Lithium–Sulfur Batteries AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Anode-free lithium–sulfur batteries (AFLSBs) show a surprisingly prolonged cycle life 2-fold higher than anode-free lithium metal batteries. The principal difference is the presence of an intrinsic polysulfide (PS) shuttle between electrodes in AFLSBs. However, the underlying mechanism for the impact of PS redox species on the electrochemical performance of AFLSBs is not clearly understood. Herein, we investigate the role of PS redox species in retrieving inactive lithium for compensating lithium inventory loss using titration gas chromatography, thereby quantifying inactive lithium accumulated after several cycles. Moreover, XPS analysis reveals reduced lithium sulfide (Li2S/Li2S2) species formed through PS redox shuttle refresh inactive solid electrolyte interface (SEI) composition and stabilize the consecutive cycle lithium deposition. Interestingly, synchrotron-based operando transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) reveals dense and granular electrodeposited lithium morphologies in AFLSBs. Therefore, the interplay between reviving inactive lithium for compensating lithium inventory loss and stabilizing lithium electrodeposition endows high electrochemical performance in AFLSBs.
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
Anode-free lithium–sulfur batteries (AFLSBs) show a surprisingly prolonged cycle life 2-fold higher than anode-free lithium metal batteries. The principal difference is the presence of an intrinsic polysulfide (PS) shuttle between electrodes in AFLSBs. However, the underlying mechanism for the impact of PS redox species on the electrochemical performance of AFLSBs is not clearly understood. Herein, we investigate the role of PS redox species in retrieving inactive lithium for compensating lithium inventory loss using titration gas chromatography, thereby quantifying inactive lithium accumulated after several cycles. Moreover, XPS analysis reveals reduced lithium sulfide (Li2S/Li2S2) species formed through PS redox shuttle refresh inactive solid electrolyte interface (SEI) composition and stabilize the consecutive cycle lithium deposition. Interestingly, synchrotron-based operando transmission X-ray microscopy (TXM) reveals dense and granular electrodeposited lithium morphologies in AFLSBs. Therefore, the interplay between reviving inactive lithium for compensating lithium inventory loss and stabilizing lithium electrodeposition endows high electrochemical performance in AFLSBs.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Misganaw Adigo Weret, ShiKai Jiang, Kassie Nigus Shitaw, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2023(8). DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622. |
| MLA | [1] Misganaw Adigo Weret, et al., ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622. |
| APA | [1] Misganaw Adigo Weret, ShiKai Jiang, Kassie Nigus Shitaw, ChiaYu Chang, Teshager Mekonnen Tekaligne, JengChian Chiou, ShengChiang Yang, Nigusu Tiruneh Temesgen, Yosef Nikodimos, SheHuang Wu, ChunChieh Wang, WeiNien Su, & Bing Joe Hwang. (2023). ACS Energy Letters(8). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622 |
| IEEE | [1] Misganaw Adigo Weret, ShiKai Jiang, Kassie Nigus Shitaw, ChiaYu Chang, Teshager Mekonnen Tekaligne, JengChian Chiou, ShengChiang Yang, Nigusu Tiruneh Temesgen, Yosef Nikodimos, SheHuang Wu, ChunChieh Wang, WeiNien Su, and Bing Joe Hwang, ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00622. |
