daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Simulation and validation of three dimension functionally graded materials by material jetting AITranslate

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials; Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis; North Carolina State University
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

The goal of this work is to validate the material models for parts created with a Material Jetting 3-dimensional printer through the comparison of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations and physical tests. The strain maps generated by a video extensometer for multi-material samples are compared to the FEA results based on our material models. Two base materials (ABS-like and rubber-like) and their composites are co-printed in the graded tensile test samples. The graded islands are embedded in the rubber-like test specimens. The simulations were conducted utilizing previously fitted material models, a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model for the elastic materials (Tango Black+, DM95, and DM60) and a bilinear model for the rigid material (Vero White+). The results show that the simulation results based on our material models can predict the deformation behaviors of the multi-material samples during a uniaxial tensile test. Our simulation results are able to predict the maximum strain in the matrix material (TB+) within 5% error. Both global deformation pattern and local strain level confirm the validity of the simulated material models. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (156KB) Download : Download full-size image

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

The goal of this work is to validate the material models for parts created with a Material Jetting 3-dimensional printer through the comparison of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations and physical tests. The strain maps generated by a video extensometer for multi-material samples are compared to the FEA results based on our material models. Two base materials (ABS-like and rubber-like) and their composites are co-printed in the graded tensile test samples. The graded islands are embedded in the rubber-like test specimens. The simulations were conducted utilizing previously fitted material models, a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model for the elastic materials (Tango Black+, DM95, and DM60) and a bilinear model for the rigid material (Vero White+). The results show that the simulation results based on our material models can predict the deformation behaviors of the multi-material samples during a uniaxial tensile test. Our simulation results are able to predict the maximum strain in the matrix material (TB+) within 5% error. Both global deformation pattern and local strain level confirm the validity of the simulated material models. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (156KB) Download : Download full-size image

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Eduardo Salcedo, Dongcheon Baek, Aaron Berndt, et al. Additive Manufacturing, 2018(22). DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027.
MLA [1] Eduardo Salcedo, et al., Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027.
APA [1] Eduardo Salcedo, Dongcheon Baek, Aaron Berndt, & Jong Eun Ryu. (2018). Additive Manufacturing(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027
IEEE [1] Eduardo Salcedo, Dongcheon Baek, Aaron Berndt, and Jong Eun Ryu, Additive Manufacturing, no. 22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.027.