Understanding Comparable Charge Transport Between Edge-on and Face-on Polymers in a Thiazolothiazole Polymer System AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
The orientation of semiconducting polymers is one of the most important factors for the charge transport and thus the performance of polymer-based devices such as organic field-effect transistors and organic photovoltaics. Here, we study thiophene–thiazolothiazole polymers with different alkyl side chains, which apparently form the “edge-on” or “face-on” orientation depending on the side chain composition. Interestingly, hole mobilities observed in transistors were seemingly independent of the backbone orientation. However, in-depth X-ray analysis revealed that while the edge-on polymers evenly had the edge-on to face-on fraction throughout the film thickness, the face-on polymers had the unevenly distributed edge-on to face-on fraction: the edge-on orientation was abundant at the film–substrate interface and the face-on orientation was abundant in the bulk. Thus, in fact the edge-on was the dominant orientation at the film–substrate interface in all the polymers, which agrees well with the high hole mobility in the face-on polymers that was comparable to the edge-on polymers. Our findings provide good guidelines for in-depth understanding of structure–property relationship in semiconducting polymers and their optoelectronic devices.
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00111
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
The orientation of semiconducting polymers is one of the most important factors for the charge transport and thus the performance of polymer-based devices such as organic field-effect transistors and organic photovoltaics. Here, we study thiophene–thiazolothiazole polymers with different alkyl side chains, which apparently form the “edge-on” or “face-on” orientation depending on the side chain composition. Interestingly, hole mobilities observed in transistors were seemingly independent of the backbone orientation. However, in-depth X-ray analysis revealed that while the edge-on polymers evenly had the edge-on to face-on fraction throughout the film thickness, the face-on polymers had the unevenly distributed edge-on to face-on fraction: the edge-on orientation was abundant at the film–substrate interface and the face-on orientation was abundant in the bulk. Thus, in fact the edge-on was the dominant orientation at the film–substrate interface in all the polymers, which agrees well with the high hole mobility in the face-on polymers that was comparable to the edge-on polymers. Our findings provide good guidelines for in-depth understanding of structure–property relationship in semiconducting polymers and their optoelectronic devices.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Masahiko Saito, Tomoyuki Koganezawa, Itaru Osaka. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2019(1). DOI:10.1021/acsapm.8b00111. |
| MLA | [1] Masahiko Saito, et al., ACS Applied Polymer Materials, no. 1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00111. |
| APA | [1] Masahiko Saito, Tomoyuki Koganezawa, & Itaru Osaka. (2019). ACS Applied Polymer Materials(1). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00111 |
| IEEE | [1] Masahiko Saito, Tomoyuki Koganezawa, and Itaru Osaka, ACS Applied Polymer Materials, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00111. keywords: {organic fieldeffect transistors;semiconducting polymers;orientation;interfacial orientation;thiazolothiazole} |
