daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Are Three-Dimensional Batteries Beneficial? Analyzing Historical Data to Elucidate Performance Advantages AITranslate

University of Washington; University of Washington; University of Washington; University of Washington
AITranslate
Publisher: ACS
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are composed of planar stacks of anodes, cathodes, and separators, all immersed in electrolyte and sandwiched between current collectors. However, planar LIBs have a performance trade-off where increasing electrode thickness leads to higher capacity but lower rate capability. Three-dimensional (3D) batteries circumvent this issue with 3D electrode architecture. Herein, we systematically analyze 3D LIBs from experimental publications over the past 20 years. Using a previously developed empirical model, we obtain parameters to quantify the rate capability and rate-limiting mechanisms of 3D LIBs. Compared to conventional LIBs, 3D LIBs exhibit better rate capability─confirming their expected performance benefit. To provide further insight, we investigate the impact of liquid-phase and solid-phase diffusion mechanisms on this performance benefit. Lastly, we discuss the design landscape of 3D LIBs across multiple electrode designs and material sets and highlight our perspective on the applicability of 3D LIBs at different application scales.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02208

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Conventional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are composed of planar stacks of anodes, cathodes, and separators, all immersed in electrolyte and sandwiched between current collectors. However, planar LIBs have a performance trade-off where increasing electrode thickness leads to higher capacity but lower rate capability. Three-dimensional (3D) batteries circumvent this issue with 3D electrode architecture. Herein, we systematically analyze 3D LIBs from experimental publications over the past 20 years. Using a previously developed empirical model, we obtain parameters to quantify the rate capability and rate-limiting mechanisms of 3D LIBs. Compared to conventional LIBs, 3D LIBs exhibit better rate capability─confirming their expected performance benefit. To provide further insight, we investigate the impact of liquid-phase and solid-phase diffusion mechanisms on this performance benefit. Lastly, we discuss the design landscape of 3D LIBs across multiple electrode designs and material sets and highlight our perspective on the applicability of 3D LIBs at different application scales.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] ChihHsuan Hung, Phong Huynh, Katrina Teo, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2023(8). DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02208.
MLA [1] ChihHsuan Hung, et al., ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02208.
APA [1] ChihHsuan Hung, Phong Huynh, Katrina Teo, & Corie L. Cobb. (2023). ACS Energy Letters(8). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02208
IEEE [1] ChihHsuan Hung, Phong Huynh, Katrina Teo, and Corie L. Cobb, ACS Energy Letters, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02208.