daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Vortex-Fluidic-Mediated Fabrication of Polysulfone Ultrafiltration Membranes Incorporating Graphene Oxide AITranslate

Flinders University; Fujian Normal University; Flinders University; Flinders University; Flinders University; Edith Cowan University; Edith Cowan University; Flinders University
AITranslate
Publisher: ACS
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Polysulfone (PSF) ultrafiltration membranes were fabricated using a continuous flow micro-mixing process under high shear in a vortex fluidic device (VFD), followed by phase inversion of the cast solution. This involved investigating the effect of PSF concentrations (10, 15, and 20%) and rotational speed of the VFD for continuous mixing at 30 °C on the membranes’ properties. These were compared with variants fabricated using conventional batch mixing in relation to structural, morphological, thermal, and mechanical properties, in addition to aspects of hydrophilicity and filtration performance. Graphene oxide (GO) was then incorporated into these membranes using both techniques in order to enhance their properties. The required mixing time for VFD processing was significantly shorter relative to conventional mixing, being reduced from >24 to <4 h. Scanning electron microscopy established that for microfluidic mixing, the PSF membranes possessed a more finger-like cross-section for a 10% PSF concentration, with a more sponge-like structure at higher concentrations. Moreover, the higher the rotational speed of the VFD, the higher the resulting porosity and permeability, with optimal levels of 84.3 ± 2.4% and 106 ± 4.3 LMH/bar, respectively, at 7k rpm. This brought about a 22% increase in porosity and permeability relative to the control experiment using conventional mixing. Compared to pristine PSF membranes, incorporating 1 wt % of GO using VFD processing increased the permeability of the membranes from 97.26 ± 3.3 to 123 ± 3.9 LMH/bar, with the NaCl rejection from 18.53 ± 1.3 to 34.3 ± 1.7% and bovine serum albumin rejection from 53.83 ± 2.00 to 74.2 ± 2.1%, respectively.

KeyWords AITranslate

ultrafiltration membrane fabrication GO/PSF composite membrane vortex fluidic device (VFD) membrane filtration Show More
No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c00109

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Polysulfone (PSF) ultrafiltration membranes were fabricated using a continuous flow micro-mixing process under high shear in a vortex fluidic device (VFD), followed by phase inversion of the cast solution. This involved investigating the effect of PSF concentrations (10, 15, and 20%) and rotational speed of the VFD for continuous mixing at 30 °C on the membranes’ properties. These were compared with variants fabricated using conventional batch mixing in relation to structural, morphological, thermal, and mechanical properties, in addition to aspects of hydrophilicity and filtration performance. Graphene oxide (GO) was then incorporated into these membranes using both techniques in order to enhance their properties. The required mixing time for VFD processing was significantly shorter relative to conventional mixing, being reduced from >24 to <4 h. Scanning electron microscopy established that for microfluidic mixing, the PSF membranes possessed a more finger-like cross-section for a 10% PSF concentration, with a more sponge-like structure at higher concentrations. Moreover, the higher the rotational speed of the VFD, the higher the resulting porosity and permeability, with optimal levels of 84.3 ± 2.4% and 106 ± 4.3 LMH/bar, respectively, at 7k rpm. This brought about a 22% increase in porosity and permeability relative to the control experiment using conventional mixing. Compared to pristine PSF membranes, incorporating 1 wt % of GO using VFD processing increased the permeability of the membranes from 97.26 ± 3.3 to 123 ± 3.9 LMH/bar, with the NaCl rejection from 18.53 ± 1.3 to 34.3 ± 1.7% and bovine serum albumin rejection from 53.83 ± 2.00 to 74.2 ± 2.1%, respectively.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Aghil Igder, Wanling Cai, Xuan Luo, et al. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2022(4). DOI:10.1021/acsapm.2c00109.
MLA [1] Aghil Igder, et al., ACS Applied Polymer Materials, no. 4, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c00109.
APA [1] Aghil Igder, Wanling Cai, Xuan Luo, Ahmed H. M. AlAntaki, Kasturi Vimalanathan, Alireza Keshavarz, Ataollah Nosrati, & Colin L. Raston. (2022). ACS Applied Polymer Materials(4). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.2c00109
IEEE [1] Aghil Igder, Wanling Cai, Xuan Luo, Ahmed H. M. AlAntaki, Kasturi Vimalanathan, Alireza Keshavarz, Ataollah Nosrati, and Colin L. Raston, ACS Applied Polymer Materials, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsapm.2c00109. keywords: {ultrafiltration membrane fabrication;GO/PSF composite membrane;vortex fluidic device (VFD);membrane filtration;Show More}