Electrical Properties of HfO2 on Si1–xGex Substrates Pretreated Using a Y Precursor with and without Subsequent Oxidant Pulsing AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
We introduced Y–O bonds in the interfacial layer between HfO2 and Si1–xGex (x = 0, 0.15, and 0.3) using two different pretreatment methods to minimize the number of interfacial defects. The pretreatments involved the application of cyclic pulses of Y(CpBut)3 and N2, which proceeded with or without the injection of an oxidizing agent (H2O) at 250 °C, which was the temperature used for the subsequent in situ atomic layer deposition of HfO2. Both Y pretreatments were beneficial in reducing the leakage current and positive flatband voltage shift, which were induced by an increase in the Ge concentration of the substrate. In addition, the interface state density was significantly reduced by the pretreatments, and this effect was more pronounced when the oxidizing agent injection step was skipped. However, both pretreatments increased the capacitance-equivalent oxide thickness, thereby having an adverse effect, possibly owing to a change in the composition of the interfacial layer.
KeyWords AITranslate
Basic Information:
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01641
Chinese Library Classification Number:
Citation Information:
We introduced Y–O bonds in the interfacial layer between HfO2 and Si1–xGex (x = 0, 0.15, and 0.3) using two different pretreatment methods to minimize the number of interfacial defects. The pretreatments involved the application of cyclic pulses of Y(CpBut)3 and N2, which proceeded with or without the injection of an oxidizing agent (H2O) at 250 °C, which was the temperature used for the subsequent in situ atomic layer deposition of HfO2. Both Y pretreatments were beneficial in reducing the leakage current and positive flatband voltage shift, which were induced by an increase in the Ge concentration of the substrate. In addition, the interface state density was significantly reduced by the pretreatments, and this effect was more pronounced when the oxidizing agent injection step was skipped. However, both pretreatments increased the capacitance-equivalent oxide thickness, thereby having an adverse effect, possibly owing to a change in the composition of the interfacial layer.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Woohui Lee, Jehoon Lee, Deokjoon Eom, et al. ACS Applied Electronic Materials, 2023(5). DOI:10.1021/acsaelm.2c01641. |
| MLA | [1] Woohui Lee, et al., ACS Applied Electronic Materials, no. 5, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01641. |
| APA | [1] Woohui Lee, Jehoon Lee, Deokjoon Eom, Joohee Oh, Changyu Park, Jinyong Kim, Hyungchul Shin, & Hyoungsub Kim. (2023). ACS Applied Electronic Materials(5). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c01641 |
| IEEE | [1] Woohui Lee, Jehoon Lee, Deokjoon Eom, Joohee Oh, Changyu Park, Jinyong Kim, Hyungchul Shin, and Hyoungsub Kim, ACS Applied Electronic Materials, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01641. keywords: {HfO2 Si1−xGex surface treatment Y(CpBut)3 electrical characteristics} |
