daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

pH Effects on the Selectivity of the Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction on Graphene-Embedded Fe–N–C Motifs: Bridging Concepts between Molecular Homogeneous and Solid-State Heterogeneous Catalysis AITranslate

Technical University Berlin; Technical University Berlin; Technical University Berlin; Technical University Berlin; Technical University Berlin; University of Copenhagen; University of Copenhagen; Technical University Berlin
AITranslate
Publisher: ACS
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a promising route for converting CO2 and excess renewable energy into valuable chemicals and synthetic fuels. Recently, carbon-based solid materials containing dopant-levels of transition metal and nitrogen (M–N–C) have emerged as a cost-effective, energy-efficient catalyst for the direct coreduction of CO2 and H2O to CO. Fe–N–C catalysts are particularly interesting as they can reduce CO further to hydrocarbons. Despite these promising reports, the influence of the reaction conditions on the catalytic performance of Fe–N–C catalysts has not been addressed. Here, we study the role of the electrolyte on the CO2RR selectivity. Unlike hydrogen or methane generation, catalytic CO production is independent of the electrolyte pH on the normal hydrogen electrode potential scale, suggesting a decoupled elementary proton–electron transfer mechanism for CO formation. The similarity between this heterogeneous charge-transfer reaction mechanism and that of molecular metal–nitrogen porphyrin-type macrocyclic complexes strongly suggests that the carbon-embedded FeNx motifs of the solid-state electrocatalyst act as the primary catalytically active center and illustrates yet another example of unifying concepts between molecular and solid-state catalysis.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00273

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is a promising route for converting CO2 and excess renewable energy into valuable chemicals and synthetic fuels. Recently, carbon-based solid materials containing dopant-levels of transition metal and nitrogen (M–N–C) have emerged as a cost-effective, energy-efficient catalyst for the direct coreduction of CO2 and H2O to CO. Fe–N–C catalysts are particularly interesting as they can reduce CO further to hydrocarbons. Despite these promising reports, the influence of the reaction conditions on the catalytic performance of Fe–N–C catalysts has not been addressed. Here, we study the role of the electrolyte on the CO2RR selectivity. Unlike hydrogen or methane generation, catalytic CO production is independent of the electrolyte pH on the normal hydrogen electrode potential scale, suggesting a decoupled elementary proton–electron transfer mechanism for CO formation. The similarity between this heterogeneous charge-transfer reaction mechanism and that of molecular metal–nitrogen porphyrin-type macrocyclic complexes strongly suggests that the carbon-embedded FeNx motifs of the solid-state electrocatalyst act as the primary catalytically active center and illustrates yet another example of unifying concepts between molecular and solid-state catalysis.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Ana Sofia Varela, Matthias Kroschel, Nathaniel D. Leonard, et al. ACS Energy Letters, 2018(3). DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00273.
MLA [1] Ana Sofia Varela, et al., ACS Energy Letters, no. 3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00273.
APA [1] Ana Sofia Varela, Matthias Kroschel, Nathaniel D. Leonard, Wen Ju, Julian Steinberg, Alexander Bagger, Jan Rossmeisl, & Peter Strasser. (2018). ACS Energy Letters(3). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00273
IEEE [1] Ana Sofia Varela, Matthias Kroschel, Nathaniel D. Leonard, Wen Ju, Julian Steinberg, Alexander Bagger, Jan Rossmeisl, and Peter Strasser, ACS Energy Letters, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00273.