daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Delocalization Drives Free Charge Generation in Conjugated Polymer Films AITranslate

University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado Boulder; University of Colorado Boulder
AITranslate
Publisher: ACS
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

We demonstrate that the product of photoinduced electron transfer between a conjugated polymer host and a dilute molecular sensitizer is controlled by the structural state of the polymer. Ordered semicrystalline solids exhibit free charge generation, while disordered polymers in the melt phase do not. We use photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC) measurements to sweep through polymer melt transitions in situ. Free charge generation measured by TRMC turns off upon melting, whereas PL quenching of the molecular sensitizers remains constant, implying unchanged electron transfer efficiency. The key difference is the intermolecular order of the polymer host in the solid state compared to the melt. We propose that this order–disorder transition modulates the localization length of the initial charge-transfer state, which controls the probability of free charge formation.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00108

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

We demonstrate that the product of photoinduced electron transfer between a conjugated polymer host and a dilute molecular sensitizer is controlled by the structural state of the polymer. Ordered semicrystalline solids exhibit free charge generation, while disordered polymers in the melt phase do not. We use photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved microwave conductivity (TRMC) measurements to sweep through polymer melt transitions in situ. Free charge generation measured by TRMC turns off upon melting, whereas PL quenching of the molecular sensitizers remains constant, implying unchanged electron transfer efficiency. The key difference is the intermolecular order of the polymer host in the solid state compared to the melt. We propose that this order–disorder transition modulates the localization length of the initial charge-transfer state, which controls the probability of free charge formation.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] Natalie A. Pace, Obadiah G. Reid, Garry Rumbles. ACS Energy Letters, 2018(3). DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00108.
MLA [1] Natalie A. Pace, et al., ACS Energy Letters, no. 3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00108.
APA [1] Natalie A. Pace, Obadiah G. Reid, & Garry Rumbles. (2018). ACS Energy Letters(3). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00108
IEEE [1] Natalie A. Pace, Obadiah G. Reid, and Garry Rumbles, ACS Energy Letters, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00108.