Lithium Extraction Performance of LiFePO4 with Different Coating Density via Electrochemical De-Intercalation/Intercalation Method AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
Electrochemical de-intercalation/intercalation method is a new process for lithium extraction from salt lake brine,which has the advantages of strong selectivity for lithium,green and pollution-free,and low impurity content of lithium-rich anolyte. However,it owns a low current density. For electrochemical technology,current density is an important indicator to measure economic benefit. Therefore,high current density is conductive to promoting the industrial application of lithium extraction from salt lake brine via electrochemical de-intercalation/intercalation method. For the method,increasing the coating amount of active material LiFePO4 on the electrode surface is one of the effective methods to improve the current density. But the increase of electrode coating density has a negative effect on the mass transfer performance and cycle performance of the electrode. Therefore,cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to investigate the differences in the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 electrodes with different coating densities,the effects of electrode coating density on lithium adsorption capacity,current density and cycle performance were investigated by lithium de-intercalation and intercalation experiments using a battery test system,and the crystal structure of electrode material was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Aimed at selecting a appropriate coating density of LiFePO4 electrode with excellent lithium extraction performance and cycle performance. The electrochemical study results showed that with the increase of electrode coating density,on the one hand,the content of active material LiFePO4 and the porosity of electrode material increased,which was conducive to improving the adsorption capacity of LiFePO4 electrode for lithium ions and strengthening the mass transfer process of lithium ions,thus increasing the current density;on the other hand,the thickness of the electrode increased,which led to longer lithium ions transfer distance and greater mass transfer resistance,making it difficult for lithium ions to diffuse into the internal of LiFePO4 electrode to participate in the reaction in a short period of time,resulting in more serious polarization of the electrochemical system and even hydrogen or oxygen evolution side reactions. This caused a deterioration of the electrode cycle performance. The results of the lithium de-intercalation and intercalation study showed that the lithium adsorption capacity of the electrode and lithium ions exchange rate gradually increased when the coating density increased from 40 to 55 mg·cm-2,but as the coating density continued to increase,the whole electrolysis process time consumption increased significantly,the lithium adsorption capacity of the electrode and lithium ions exchange rate gradually decreased. XRD patterns of FePO4 cathode after the completion of electrolysis showed that the active material FePO4 which not involved in reaction of the electrode inner layer increased with the increase of electrode coating density,which explained why the lithium adsorption capacity of electrode with high coating density was lower. The results were consistent with CV test. Meanwhile,the amount of LiFePO4 active material in the electrode increased with the increase of coating density,so the total electrolytic capacity of electrode in the lithium extraction process gradually increased. But the constant current electrolytic capacity ratio in the electrolysis process showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of electrode coating density. At 55 mg·cm-2,the constant current electrolytic capacity accounted for 48.7% of the total electrolytic capacity,and the maximum current density up to 13.83 A·m-2,while the electrode showed excellent lithium adsorption capacity. The results of electrode surface morphology analysis showed that the surface of LiFePO4 electrode was covered with cracks due to the volatilization of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) during the drying process of electrode,which was conducive to the soakage of electrolyte into the interior of electrode and improved the mass transfer process of lithium ions. However,the electrode with higher coating density,the greater amount of NMP was evaporated at the beginning of the drying process,which increased the stress expansion between active material and made the cracks larger. The larger cracks reduced the adhesion of active material on the collector fluid,resulting in the active material fell off under the immersion and washing of solution in the process of long lithium extraction cycles,which reduced the cycle life of LiFePO4 electrode. After 50 lithium extraction cycles,the mass loss rate of the electrode with 40 mg·cm-2 coating density was only 2.75%,and the capacity retention rate was 94.44%,while the mass loss rate of the electrode with 100 mg·cm-2 coating density was as high as 9.65%,and the capacity retention rate was decreased to 83.28%. Therefore,considering the influence of coating density on electrochemical performance,lithium extraction performance and cycle performance of LiFePO4 electrode,55 mg·cm-2 was determined as the optimal electrode coating density. In the simulated brine,the lithium adsorption capacity of LiFePO4 electrode was 32.5 mg·g-1,which showed excellent lithium extraction performance;and the mass ratio of magnesium to lithium in the lithium-rich anolyte reduced to 0.58,which fully met the requirements of Li2CO3 preparation process. At the same time,the capacity retention rate of LiFePO4 electrode was 90.62% after 50 cycles,which showed great cycle performance
KeyWords AITranslate
[1]Eftekhari A. Lithium batteries for electric vehicles:From economy to research strategy [J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,2019, 7(6):5602.
[2]Grosjean C,Miranda P H,Perrin M,Poggi P. Assessment of world lithium resources and consequences of their geographic distribution on the expected development of the electric vehicle industry [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2012, 16(3):1735.
[3]Opitz A,Badami P,Shen L,Vignarooban K,Kannan A M. Can Li-Ion batteries be the panacea for automotive applications? [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017, 68:685.
[4]Martin G,Rentsch L,Höck M,Bertau M. Lithium market research–global supply,future demand and price development [J]. Energy Storage Materials,2017, 6:171.
[5]Meng F,McNeice J,Zadeh S S,Ghahreman A. Review of lithium production and recovery from minerals,brines,and lithium-Ion batteries [J]. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review,2021, 42(2):123.
[6]Kesler S E,Gruber P W,Medina P A,Keoleian G A,Everson M P,Wallington T J. Global lithium resources:Relative importance of pegmatite,brine and other deposits [J]. Ore Geology Reviews,2012, 48:55.
[7](邓红云,钟盛文,刘雨鑫,彭卫发,张绍军. 硫酸法从锂磷铝石中提取锂工艺研究及优化 [J]. 有色金属科学与工程,2022, 13(4):35.)
H Y Deng,S W Zhong,Y X Liu,W F Peng,S J Zhang. Study and optimizationof lithium extraction from amblygonite by the sulfuric acid method [J]. Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering,2022, 13(4):35.
[8]Swain B. Recovery and recycling of lithium:A review [J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2017, 172:388.
[9]Pramanik B K,Asif M B,Roychand R,Shu L,Jegatheesan V,Bhuiyan M,Hai F I. Lithium recovery from salt-lake brine:Impact of competing cations,pretreatment and preconcentration [J]. Chemosphere,2020, 260:127623.
[10]Pramanik B K,Asif M B,Kentish S,Long Duc N,Hai F I. Lithium enrichment from a simulated salt lake brine using an integrated nanofiltration-membrane distillation process [J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2019, 7(5):103395.
[11]Hamzaoui A H,M'nif A,Hammi H,Rokbani R. Contribution to the lithium recovery from brine [J]. Desalination,2003, 158(1):221.
[12]Liu X H,Zhong M L,Chen X Y,Zhao Z W. Separating lithium and magnesium in brine by aluminum-based materials [J]. Hydrometallurgy,2018, 176:73.
[13]Zhang Y,Hu Y H,Sun N,Khoso S A,Wang L,Sun W. A novel precipitant for separating lithium from magnesium in high Mg/Li ratio brine [J]. Hydrometallurgy,2019, 187:125.
[14]Shi C L,Jing Y,Xiao J,Wang X Q,Yao Y,Jia Y Z. Solvent extraction of lithium from aqueous solution using non-fluorinated functionalized ionic liquids as extraction agents [J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2017, 172:473.
[15]Zhou Z Y,Liu H T,Fan J H,Liu X T,Hu Y F,Hu Y L,Wang Y,Ren Z Q. Selective extraction of lithium ion from aqueous solution with sodium phosphomolybdate as a coextraction agent [J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,2019, 7(9):8885.
[16]Yang F,Chen S C,Shi C T,Xue F,Zhang X X,Ju S G,Xing W H. A facile synthesis of hexagonal spinel λ-MnO2 ion-sieves for highly selective Li+ adsorption [J]. Processes,2018, 6(5):59.
[17](陈浩,何利华,刘旭恒. NiPO4/LiNiPO4离子筛盐湖提锂热力学分析 [J]. 稀有金属,2016, 40(10):1045.)
H Chen,L H He,X H Liu. Thermodynamic analysis of Li-extraction from salt lake by NiPO4/LiNiPO4 ion-sieve [J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals,2016, 40(10):1045.
[18](刘悦宇,李婷婷,李世伟,尹少华. 纳滤膜传质机制模型及在盐湖提锂应用中的研究 [J]. 稀有金属,2022, 48(2):262.)
Y Y Liu,T T Li,S W Li,S H Yin. Development of research on mass transfer mechanism model of nanofiltration membrane and its application in separation of magnesium and lithium from salt lake brine [J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals,2022, 48(2):262.
[19]Xu W H,Liu D F,He L H,Zhao Z W. A comprehensive membrane process for preparing lithium carbonate from high Mg/Li brine [J]. Membranes,2020, 10(12):371.
[20]Onorato C,Banasiak L J,Schäfer A I. Inorganic trace contaminant removal from real brackish groundwater using electrodialysis [J]. Separation and Purification Technology,2017, 187:426.
[21]Liu X H,Chen X Y,He L H,Zhao Z W. Study on extraction of lithium from salt lake brine by membrane electrolysis [J]. Desalination,2015, 376:35.
[22]Zhao Z W,Si X F,Liu X H,He L H,Liang X X. Li extraction from high Mg/Li ratio brine with LiFePO4/FePO4 as electrode materials [J]. Hydrometallurgy,2013, 133:75.
[23]Xu W H,He L H,Zhao Z W. Lithium extraction from high Mg/Li brine via electrochemical intercalation/de-intercalation system using LiMn2O4 materials [J]. Desalination,2021, 503:114935.
[24]He L H,Xu W H,Song Y F,Luo Y Z,Liu X H,Zhao Z W. New insights into the application of lithium-ion battery materials:Selective extraction of lithium from brines via a rocking-chair lithium-ion battery system [J]. Global Challenges,2018, 2(2):1700079.
[25]Zhao Z W,Liu X H. Method and device for extracting and enriching lithium [P]. US:US9062385,2013.
[26]Jeong J,Lee H,Choi J,Ryou M H,Lee Y M. Effect of LiFePO4 cathode density and thickness on electrochemical performance of lithium metal polymer batteries prepared by in situ thermal polymerization [J]. Electrochimica Acta,2015, 154:149.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21040023
Chinese Library Classification Number:TF826.3
Citation Information:
Electrochemical de-intercalation/intercalation method is a new process for lithium extraction from salt lake brine,which has the advantages of strong selectivity for lithium,green and pollution-free,and low impurity content of lithium-rich anolyte. However,it owns a low current density. For electrochemical technology,current density is an important indicator to measure economic benefit. Therefore,high current density is conductive to promoting the industrial application of lithium extraction from salt lake brine via electrochemical de-intercalation/intercalation method. For the method,increasing the coating amount of active material LiFePO4 on the electrode surface is one of the effective methods to improve the current density. But the increase of electrode coating density has a negative effect on the mass transfer performance and cycle performance of the electrode. Therefore,cyclic voltammetry (CV) was used to investigate the differences in the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 electrodes with different coating densities,the effects of electrode coating density on lithium adsorption capacity,current density and cycle performance were investigated by lithium de-intercalation and intercalation experiments using a battery test system,and the crystal structure of electrode material was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Aimed at selecting a appropriate coating density of LiFePO4 electrode with excellent lithium extraction performance and cycle performance. The electrochemical study results showed that with the increase of electrode coating density,on the one hand,the content of active material LiFePO4 and the porosity of electrode material increased,which was conducive to improving the adsorption capacity of LiFePO4 electrode for lithium ions and strengthening the mass transfer process of lithium ions,thus increasing the current density;on the other hand,the thickness of the electrode increased,which led to longer lithium ions transfer distance and greater mass transfer resistance,making it difficult for lithium ions to diffuse into the internal of LiFePO4 electrode to participate in the reaction in a short period of time,resulting in more serious polarization of the electrochemical system and even hydrogen or oxygen evolution side reactions. This caused a deterioration of the electrode cycle performance. The results of the lithium de-intercalation and intercalation study showed that the lithium adsorption capacity of the electrode and lithium ions exchange rate gradually increased when the coating density increased from 40 to 55 mg·cm-2,but as the coating density continued to increase,the whole electrolysis process time consumption increased significantly,the lithium adsorption capacity of the electrode and lithium ions exchange rate gradually decreased. XRD patterns of FePO4 cathode after the completion of electrolysis showed that the active material FePO4 which not involved in reaction of the electrode inner layer increased with the increase of electrode coating density,which explained why the lithium adsorption capacity of electrode with high coating density was lower. The results were consistent with CV test. Meanwhile,the amount of LiFePO4 active material in the electrode increased with the increase of coating density,so the total electrolytic capacity of electrode in the lithium extraction process gradually increased. But the constant current electrolytic capacity ratio in the electrolysis process showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the increase of electrode coating density. At 55 mg·cm-2,the constant current electrolytic capacity accounted for 48.7% of the total electrolytic capacity,and the maximum current density up to 13.83 A·m-2,while the electrode showed excellent lithium adsorption capacity. The results of electrode surface morphology analysis showed that the surface of LiFePO4 electrode was covered with cracks due to the volatilization of N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) during the drying process of electrode,which was conducive to the soakage of electrolyte into the interior of electrode and improved the mass transfer process of lithium ions. However,the electrode with higher coating density,the greater amount of NMP was evaporated at the beginning of the drying process,which increased the stress expansion between active material and made the cracks larger. The larger cracks reduced the adhesion of active material on the collector fluid,resulting in the active material fell off under the immersion and washing of solution in the process of long lithium extraction cycles,which reduced the cycle life of LiFePO4 electrode. After 50 lithium extraction cycles,the mass loss rate of the electrode with 40 mg·cm-2 coating density was only 2.75%,and the capacity retention rate was 94.44%,while the mass loss rate of the electrode with 100 mg·cm-2 coating density was as high as 9.65%,and the capacity retention rate was decreased to 83.28%. Therefore,considering the influence of coating density on electrochemical performance,lithium extraction performance and cycle performance of LiFePO4 electrode,55 mg·cm-2 was determined as the optimal electrode coating density. In the simulated brine,the lithium adsorption capacity of LiFePO4 electrode was 32.5 mg·g-1,which showed excellent lithium extraction performance;and the mass ratio of magnesium to lithium in the lithium-rich anolyte reduced to 0.58,which fully met the requirements of Li2CO3 preparation process. At the same time,the capacity retention rate of LiFePO4 electrode was 90.62% after 50 cycles,which showed great cycle performance
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Weigang Zhu, Lihua He, Zhongwei Zhao. Lithium Extraction Performance of LiFePO4 with Different Coating Density via Electrochemical De-Intercalation/Intercalation Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2025, 49(10): 1473-1480. DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21040023. |
| MLA | [1] Weigang Zhu, et al., "Lithium Extraction Performance of LiFePO4 with Different Coating Density via Electrochemical De-Intercalation/Intercalation Method." Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 49, no. 10, 2025, pp. 1473-1480, https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21040023. |
| APA | [1] Weigang Zhu, Lihua He, & Zhongwei Zhao. (2025). Lithium Extraction Performance of LiFePO4 with Different Coating Density via Electrochemical De-Intercalation/Intercalation Method. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 49(10), 1473-1480. https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21040023 |
| IEEE | [1] Weigang Zhu, Lihua He, and Zhongwei Zhao, "Lithium Extraction Performance of LiFePO4 with Different Coating Density via Electrochemical De-Intercalation/Intercalation Method," Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1473-1480, 2025, doi: 10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY21040023. keywords: {electrochemical de-intercalation/intercalation method;lithium extraction from salt lake brine;LiFePO;coating density;current destiny} |
