Surface Grinding Quality of Stainless Steel by Different Magnetic Composite Particle Preparation Parameters AITranslate
Abstract AITranslate
The magnetic field-assisted grinding (MFAG) method is a novel ultra-precision surface machining technology. In this paper, a new magnetic abrasive particle with high efficiency and low cost was prepared by the bonding method to improve the uniformity of the iron-based phase and grinding phase for the ultra-precision grinding of 304 stainless steel efficiently. The effects of different component ratios on the abrasive properties of magnetic abrasive particles prepared by the bonding method were investigated. The surface morphology of magnetic abrasive particles and workpieces before and after grinding was observed by ultra-depth three-dimensional microscope and white light interferometer, and the surface quality of workpieces before and after grinding was compared by surface roughness measuring instrument, the excellent proportioning of magnetic abrasive particles by bonding method was finally determined. Two kinds of magnetic abrasive particles were prepared by different processes of bonding method and traditional mechanical mixing method, in addition, the grinding properties were investigated experimentally. The results showed that the initial surface was smoothed after grinding. In addition, the grinding marks were observed, regardless of the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase (3∶1, 4∶1 and 5∶1) used in the grinding process. When the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 4∶1, the surface roughness (Ra) decreased from 206 to 49 nm after 9 min grinding, meaning the decrease rate of surface roughness was 76.2% due to the appropriate saturation magnetization. The grinding force was 1.2, 1.6 and 2.4 N, respectively, when the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 3∶1, 4∶1 and 5∶1. Once the mass of the iron-base phase was higher, the grinding force increased sharply, resulting in deeper scratches. The mass ratio of the adhesive and curing agent was an important parameter affecting the surface roughness in the MFAG process. The surface roughness decreased first with the increase in additive E-44 epoxy resin, then increased when the mass ratio was more than 40%. It could be observed from the ground abrasive particles that the area of the grinding phase decreased from 80.5% before grinding to 32.6% after grinding with MAP-1 grinding, which was composed of organic silicon resin and curing agent. Due to the addition of E-44 epoxy resin, the toughness of the adhesive was improved, and the impact strength was enhanced. The surface quality of 304 stainless steel was improved after grinding with different ratios of iron matrix to abrasive phase particle size. However, the decreasing trend of surface roughness Ra was not the same. A continuous decrease in surface roughness Ra with increasing of grinding time, but the rate of decline was relatively slow using MAP-d2-1 (the ratio was 2∶1). After grinding with MAP-d3-1 for 9 min, the smoothest surface could be obtained. Subsequently, the surface quality deteriorated, resulting in the fastest decrease rate in surface roughness in the first 3 min using MAP-d4-1;afterwards, it slowly dropped to its lowest point in the following 6 min. The grinding force was 0.5, 1.6 and 2.0 N, respectively, when the saturation magnetization was 133.3, 149 and 151.9 emu·g−1. During the grinding process, a larger diameter iron powder should be selected first to remove the original defects on the surface of the workpiece. Then, the smaller diameter iron powder should be chosen to achieve lower surface roughness. The influence of different ratios of mixture to binder on surface roughness was finally studied. The lack of binders (the ratio was 10∶0.8) led to a lower bonding strength of the grinding phase, resulting in a few grinding phases participating in the grinding process, leading to lower grinding efficiency. On the contrary, some of the abrasive particles were wrapped entirely by the excessive adhesive (the ratio was 10∶1.2), reducing the number of cutting edges involved in the grinding process and decreasing grinding efficiency. When the ratio of the mixture to the binder was 10∶1, the surface of the iron substrate was uniformly covered with the grinding phase, which showed excellent grinding effects. To summarize, when the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 4∶1, the particle size ratio was 3∶1, the mass ratio of the mixture of iron matrix and grinding phase to binder was 10∶1, and the mass ratio of E-44 epoxy resin, silicone resin to polyamide curing agent was 4∶1∶5, the grinding effect of magnetic abrasive particles was the best. The experimental results showed that the bonding method was superior to the traditional mechanical mixing method regarding grinding efficiency and workpiece surface machining accuracy. After grinding with this magnetic abrasive particle for 9 min, the surface roughness Ra of the workpiece was reduced from the original of 206 nm to 49 nm. The surface quality of the workpiece was improved. The white corundum/ferromagnetic abrasive prepared by the bonding method could achieve high efficiency and high-quality grinding of 304 stainless steel.
KeyWords AITranslate
[1](王萌, 徐江毅, 周滔, 李波, 何林, 赵先锋. 304不锈钢切削加工表面显微硬度研究 [J].组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2021, (7): 119.)
M Wang, J Y Xu, T Zhou, B Li, L He, X F Zhao. Research on surface micro-hardness of 304 stainless steel cutting [J].Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 2021, (7): 119.
[2]Lee S H, Han J H, Lee S H, Baek G H, Park J S. Review of organic/inorganic thin film encapsulation by atomic layer de-position for a flexible OLED display [J].JOM, 2019, 71(1): 197.
[3](宗学文, 武伟杰, 刘登科, 张超. 激光选区熔化成形TC4的电解质等离子抛光工艺与性能 [J].稀有金属, 2024, 48(2): 174.)
X W Zong, W J Wu, D K Liu, C Zhang. Plasma electrolytic polishing process and performance for TC4 made by selective laser melting [J].Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2024, 48(2): 174.
[4](张祥, 马小刚, 张亮, 杨诗瑞, 解志文. 脱合金法在TC4钛合金磁粒研磨光整加工中的应用 [J].中国表面工程, 2023, 36(2): 189.)
X Zhang, X G Ma, L Zhang, S R Yang, Z W Jie. Application of the dealloying method to the grinding and finishing of TC4 titanium alloy magnetic particles [J].China Surface Engineering, 2023, 36(2): 189.
[5](郭源帆, 尹韶辉, 黄帅. Halbach阵列与不同励磁方式的磁流变抛光特性及机理研究 [J].机械工程学报, 2023, 59(15): 341.)
Y F Guo, S H Yin, S Huang. Study on machining characteristic and its mechanism of magnetorheological polishing with Halbach array and other excitation modes [J].Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(15): 341.
[6](闫艳燕, 马千里, 张亚飞, 秦飞跃, 赵波. 纵扭超声辅助磨削氮化硅亚表面损伤及其试验研究 [J].表面技术, 2023, 52(2): 55.)
Y Y Yan, Q L Ma, Y F Zhang, F Y Qin, B Zhao. Subsurface damage and experiment of silicon nitride by longitudinal torsional ultrasonic assisted grinding [J].Surface Technology, 2023, 52(2): 55.
[7](李鸿宇, 黄向明, 明阳, 李希扬, 曾清, 周东栋. 磁场辅助剪切增稠流体抛光硬质合金刀片的仿真与实验研究 [J].中国机械工程, 2023, 34(6): 650.)
H Y Li, X M Huang, Y Ming, X Y Li, Q Zeng, D D Zhou. Simulation and experimental study of magnetic field-assisted shear thickening fluid polishing for cemented carbide blades [J].China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(6): 650.
[8](赵耀耀, 陈松, 李昌龙, 李鑫, 李雨龙. 基于多轴刀路轨迹的自由曲面磁粒研磨试验 [J].表面技术, 2023, 52(4): 319.)
Y Y Zhao, S Chen, C L Li, X Li, Y L Li. Test on magnetic abrasive finishing of free-form surface based on multi-axis tool path trajectory [J].Surface Technology, 2023, 52(4): 319.
[9](陈燕, 赵杨, 陈松, 李龙邦, 韩冰. 基于旋转磁场的 6061 铝合金弯管内表面光整加工 [J].中国表面工程, 2018, 31(5): 73.)
Y Chen, Y Zhao, S Chen, L B Li, B Han. Finishing internal surface of 6061 aluminum alloy bend pipe based on rotating magnetic field [J].China Surface Engineering, 2018, 31(5): 73.
[10](王金龙, 陈燕, 张泽群, 李文龙. 瓦形磁极对磁粒研磨加工管件内表面的影响 [J].表面技术, 2022, 51(3): 158.)
J L Wang, Y Chen, Z Q Zhang, W L Li. Influence of tile type magnetic pole on inner surface of magnetic abrasive finishing grinding pipe fittings [J].Surface Technology, 2022, 51(3): 158.
[11](张祥, 马小刚, 韩冰. 基于无理数转速比的导磁轴套磁粒研磨试验 [J].表面技术, 2022, 51(12): 269.)
X Zhang, X G Ma, B Han. Magnetic particle grinding test of permeable bushing based on irrational rotational speed ratio [J].Surface Technology, 2022, 51(12): 269.
[12](张世学, 丁云龙, 吕旖旎, 王荟江, 陈燕. 烧结法制备铁基立方氮化硼磁性磨粒及其磨削性能研究 [J].表面技术, 2022, 51(9): 271.)
S X Zhang, Y L Ding, Y N Lyu, H J Wang, Y Chen. Preparation and grinding performance of iron-based cubic boron nitride magnetic abrasive particles by sintering method [J].Surface Technology, 2022, 51(9): 271.
[13](张春宇. 化学复合镀法制备磁性磨料工艺研究[D].大连: 大连理工大学, 2014.)
C Y Zhang. Study on Process of Magnetic Abrasive Grains with Electroless Composite Plating Method[D].Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2014. 1.
[14](向忠宁, 何秦川, 王益群, 任良贵. 中空SiC球形纳米颗粒的合成及吸波性能 [J].有色金属科学与工程, 2022, 13(1): 83.)
Z N Xiang, Q C He, Y Q Wang, L G Ren. Synthesis and wave absorption properties of hollow SiC spherical nanoparticles [J].Nonferrous Metals Science and Engineering, 2022, 13(1): 83.
[15](李豪, 赵凤, 沈忱思. CuO-Fe3O4@壳聚糖微球的制备及其对染料污染物的催化氧化 [J].分析试验室, 2024, 43(3): 335.)
H Li, F Zhao, C S Shen. Preparation of CuO-Fe3O4@chitosan microspheres and its catalytic oxidation of dye contaminants [J].Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2024, 43(3): 335.
[16](陈燕, 张旭. 铁基白刚玉磁性磨料的制备工艺 [J].金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2013, 33(3): 12.)
Y Chen, X Zhang. Preparation technology of iron-based white corundum magnetic abrasive grits [J].Diamond & Abrasives Engineering, 2013, 33(3): 12.
[17](梁伟, 张桂香, 张鹏, 姜林志, 秦璞, 粱久平, 滕潇. 磁力研磨光整加工ZrO2陶瓷材料试验研究 [J].表面技术, 2018, 47(9): 310.)
W Liang, G X Zhang, P Zhang, L Z Jiang, J P Liang, X Teng. Experimental research on magnetic abrasive finishing for ZrO2 ceramic materials [J].Surface Technology, 2018, 47(9): 310.
[18](吕旖旎, 陈燕, 赵杨, 巫昌海, 康璐. 基于研磨氧化锆陶瓷的金刚石/铁磁性磨粒制备研究 [J].表面技术, 2020, 49(9): 364.)
Y N Lyu, Y Chen, Y Zhao, C H Wu, L Kang. Preparation of diamond/iron magnetic abrasive particles based on grinding zirconia ceramics [J].Surface Technology, 2020, 49(9): 364.
[19](夏楠, 马小刚, 吴传宗, 张亮, 杨诗瑞, 陈燕. 磁力研磨工艺提高叶片表面质量的试验研究 [J].表面技术, 2023, 52(2): 67.)
N Xia, X G Ma, C Z Wu, L Zhang, S R Yang, Y Chen. Experimental investigation of magnetic finishing for improving blade surface quality [J].Surface Technology, 2023, 52(2): 67.
[20]Jiao A Y, Quan H J, Li Z Z, Chen Y. Study of magnetic abrasive finishing in seal ring groove surface operations [J].International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85(5-8): 1195.
[21]Ik-Tae I, Sang D M, Seong M O. Micro machining of an STS 304 bar by magnetic abrasive finishing [J].Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2009, 23(7): 1982.
[22](高玉龙. 磁力研磨光整加工及磁性磨料制备技术的研究与应用[D].淄博: 山东理工大学, 2009. 1.)
Y L Gao. Study and Application of Magnetic Abrasive Finishing and Preparation Technology of Magnetic Abrasive Grains[D].Zibo: Shandong University of Technology, 2009. 1.
[23](吕旖旎. 铁基立方氮化硼磁性磨粒的制备工艺及实验研究[D].鞍山: 辽宁科技大学, 2021. 1.)
Y N Lyu. Study on Preparation Process of CBN/Fe Magnetic Abrasive Particles and Experiment[D]. Anshan: University of Science and Technology Liaoning, 2021. 1.
[24](李木, 吴力立, 张超灿, 柳聪, 王光耀, 王新. 高性能有机硅改性环氧树脂的研究进展 [J].塑料工业, 2018, 46(7): 8.)
M Li, L L Wu, C C Zhang, C Liu, G Y Wang, X Wang. Research progress of high performance silicone modified epoxy resin [J].China Plastics Industry, 2018, 46(7): 8.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY24020006
Chinese Library Classification Number:TG580
Citation Information:
The magnetic field-assisted grinding (MFAG) method is a novel ultra-precision surface machining technology. In this paper, a new magnetic abrasive particle with high efficiency and low cost was prepared by the bonding method to improve the uniformity of the iron-based phase and grinding phase for the ultra-precision grinding of 304 stainless steel efficiently. The effects of different component ratios on the abrasive properties of magnetic abrasive particles prepared by the bonding method were investigated. The surface morphology of magnetic abrasive particles and workpieces before and after grinding was observed by ultra-depth three-dimensional microscope and white light interferometer, and the surface quality of workpieces before and after grinding was compared by surface roughness measuring instrument, the excellent proportioning of magnetic abrasive particles by bonding method was finally determined. Two kinds of magnetic abrasive particles were prepared by different processes of bonding method and traditional mechanical mixing method, in addition, the grinding properties were investigated experimentally. The results showed that the initial surface was smoothed after grinding. In addition, the grinding marks were observed, regardless of the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase (3∶1, 4∶1 and 5∶1) used in the grinding process. When the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 4∶1, the surface roughness (Ra) decreased from 206 to 49 nm after 9 min grinding, meaning the decrease rate of surface roughness was 76.2% due to the appropriate saturation magnetization. The grinding force was 1.2, 1.6 and 2.4 N, respectively, when the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 3∶1, 4∶1 and 5∶1. Once the mass of the iron-base phase was higher, the grinding force increased sharply, resulting in deeper scratches. The mass ratio of the adhesive and curing agent was an important parameter affecting the surface roughness in the MFAG process. The surface roughness decreased first with the increase in additive E-44 epoxy resin, then increased when the mass ratio was more than 40%. It could be observed from the ground abrasive particles that the area of the grinding phase decreased from 80.5% before grinding to 32.6% after grinding with MAP-1 grinding, which was composed of organic silicon resin and curing agent. Due to the addition of E-44 epoxy resin, the toughness of the adhesive was improved, and the impact strength was enhanced. The surface quality of 304 stainless steel was improved after grinding with different ratios of iron matrix to abrasive phase particle size. However, the decreasing trend of surface roughness Ra was not the same. A continuous decrease in surface roughness Ra with increasing of grinding time, but the rate of decline was relatively slow using MAP-d2-1 (the ratio was 2∶1). After grinding with MAP-d3-1 for 9 min, the smoothest surface could be obtained. Subsequently, the surface quality deteriorated, resulting in the fastest decrease rate in surface roughness in the first 3 min using MAP-d4-1;afterwards, it slowly dropped to its lowest point in the following 6 min. The grinding force was 0.5, 1.6 and 2.0 N, respectively, when the saturation magnetization was 133.3, 149 and 151.9 emu·g−1. During the grinding process, a larger diameter iron powder should be selected first to remove the original defects on the surface of the workpiece. Then, the smaller diameter iron powder should be chosen to achieve lower surface roughness. The influence of different ratios of mixture to binder on surface roughness was finally studied. The lack of binders (the ratio was 10∶0.8) led to a lower bonding strength of the grinding phase, resulting in a few grinding phases participating in the grinding process, leading to lower grinding efficiency. On the contrary, some of the abrasive particles were wrapped entirely by the excessive adhesive (the ratio was 10∶1.2), reducing the number of cutting edges involved in the grinding process and decreasing grinding efficiency. When the ratio of the mixture to the binder was 10∶1, the surface of the iron substrate was uniformly covered with the grinding phase, which showed excellent grinding effects. To summarize, when the mass ratio of iron base phase to grinding phase was 4∶1, the particle size ratio was 3∶1, the mass ratio of the mixture of iron matrix and grinding phase to binder was 10∶1, and the mass ratio of E-44 epoxy resin, silicone resin to polyamide curing agent was 4∶1∶5, the grinding effect of magnetic abrasive particles was the best. The experimental results showed that the bonding method was superior to the traditional mechanical mixing method regarding grinding efficiency and workpiece surface machining accuracy. After grinding with this magnetic abrasive particle for 9 min, the surface roughness Ra of the workpiece was reduced from the original of 206 nm to 49 nm. The surface quality of the workpiece was improved. The white corundum/ferromagnetic abrasive prepared by the bonding method could achieve high efficiency and high-quality grinding of 304 stainless steel.
quote
| GB/T 7714-2015 | [1] Youliang Wang, Tong Zhang, Wenjuan Zhang, et al. Surface Grinding Quality of Stainless Steel by Different Magnetic Composite Particle Preparation Parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 2025, 49(11): 1698-1708. DOI:10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY24020006. |
| MLA | [1] Youliang Wang, et al., "Surface Grinding Quality of Stainless Steel by Different Magnetic Composite Particle Preparation Parameters." Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 49, no. 11, 2025, pp. 1698-1708, https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY24020006. |
| APA | [1] Youliang Wang, Tong Zhang, Wenjuan Zhang, Xincheng Yin, & Ming Feng. (2025). Surface Grinding Quality of Stainless Steel by Different Magnetic Composite Particle Preparation Parameters. Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, 49(11), 1698-1708. https://doi.org/10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY24020006 |
| IEEE | [1] Youliang Wang, Tong Zhang, Wenjuan Zhang, Xincheng Yin, and Ming Feng, "Surface Grinding Quality of Stainless Steel by Different Magnetic Composite Particle Preparation Parameters," Chinese Journal of Rare Metals, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1698-1708, 2025, doi: 10.13373/j.cnki.cjrm.XY24020006. keywords: {magnetic abrasive particle;abrasive property;bonding process;white alundum;304 stainless steel material} |
