daohang fenxiangbox searchbox qikanlogonew daohangnew searchboxnew navrightzone footerzone paper

Strain in the mesoscale kinetic Monte Carlo model for sintering AITranslate

Technical University of Denmark – DTU; Technical University of Denmark – DTU;Sandia National Laboratory; San Diego State University; Technical University of Denmark – DTU
AITranslate
Publisher: Elsevier
Share Citation Information Add to Favorites

    Scan to share on WeChat or Moments

Use WeChat scan.
Share with WeChat friends or Moments

Abstract AITranslate

Highlights • We present algorithm for correct strain in kinetic Monte Carlo. • Previous algorithms is shown to produce non-uniform strain. • Microstructural evolution is similar for new and old algorithms. Shrinkage strains measured from microstructural simulations using the mesoscale kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model for solid state sintering are discussed. This model represents the microstructure using digitized discrete sites that are either grain or pore sites. The algorithm used to simulate densification by vacancy annihilation removes an isolated pore site at a grain boundary and collapses a column of sites extending from the vacancy to the surface of sintering compact, through the center of mass of the nearest grain. Using this algorithm, the existing published kMC models are shown to produce anisotropic strains for homogeneous powder compacts with aspect ratios different from unity. It is shown that the line direction biases shrinkage strains in proportion the compact dimension aspect ratios. A new algorithm that corrects this bias in strains is proposed; the direction for collapsing the column is determined by choosing a random sample face and subsequently a random point on that face as the end point for an annihilation path with equal probabilities. This algorithm is mathematically and experimentally shown to result in isotropic strains for all samples regardless of their dimensions. Finally, the microstructural evolution is shown to be similar for the new and old annihilation algorithms.

KeyWords AITranslate

No data

Basic Information:

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.051

Chinese Library Classification Number:

Citation Information:

Highlights • We present algorithm for correct strain in kinetic Monte Carlo. • Previous algorithms is shown to produce non-uniform strain. • Microstructural evolution is similar for new and old algorithms. Shrinkage strains measured from microstructural simulations using the mesoscale kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model for solid state sintering are discussed. This model represents the microstructure using digitized discrete sites that are either grain or pore sites. The algorithm used to simulate densification by vacancy annihilation removes an isolated pore site at a grain boundary and collapses a column of sites extending from the vacancy to the surface of sintering compact, through the center of mass of the nearest grain. Using this algorithm, the existing published kMC models are shown to produce anisotropic strains for homogeneous powder compacts with aspect ratios different from unity. It is shown that the line direction biases shrinkage strains in proportion the compact dimension aspect ratios. A new algorithm that corrects this bias in strains is proposed; the direction for collapsing the column is determined by choosing a random sample face and subsequently a random point on that face as the end point for an annihilation path with equal probabilities. This algorithm is mathematically and experimentally shown to result in isotropic strains for all samples regardless of their dimensions. Finally, the microstructural evolution is shown to be similar for the new and old annihilation algorithms.

quote

GB/T 7714-2015 [1] R. Bjørk, H.L. Frandsen, V. Tikare, et al. Computational Materials Science, 2014(82). DOI:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.051.
MLA [1] R. Bjørk, et al., Computational Materials Science, no. 82, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.051.
APA [1] R. Bjørk, H.L. Frandsen, V. Tikare, E. Olevsky, & N. Pryds. (2014). Computational Materials Science(82). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.051
IEEE [1] R. Bjørk, H.L. Frandsen, V. Tikare, E. Olevsky, and N. Pryds, Computational Materials Science, no. 82, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.09.051.